中韩环境政策工具比较研究

发布时间：2018-01-19 13:11

本文关键词： 中国韩国环境政策工具规制型政策工具经济型政策工具社会型政策工具　出处：《燕山大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：环境政策工具作为环境政策的有机组成部分,是连接环境政策目标与结果的桥梁,其选择极大地影响和制约着环境治理的效果。当前我国面对严峻的环境状况,政府采用多种环境政策工具来改善环境问题,取得了一定成效,但有待进一步提高。韩国在环境治理中通过环境政策工具的有效选择和实施,在环境治理领域取得了比较明显的成效,值得我们借鉴。本文利用文献分析、比较分析、案例分析等研究方法,研究了强制型、经济激励型、社会自愿型环境政策工具以及选择依据,并分别介绍了中韩两国的主要环境政策工具及其实施情况。在此基础上对两国的环境政策工具的三种类型、选择以及实施机制的比较分析发现,两国的环境政策工具的类型、选择主体、实施主体都很相似,但由于环境管理体制、决策机制和社会自治能力的不同,两国环境政策工具的选择偏好、社会参与程度和实施的保障机制等方面存在一些差异。本文通过借鉴韩国利用环境政策工具治理环境的有效经验,结合我国实际情况,提出了完善我国环境政策工具的对策。首先,完善各类环境政策工具;其次,完善我国环境政策工具的选择机制,健全环境政策工具选择的决策机制和社会参与机制;再次,按照一定原则优化我国环境政策工具的选择和组合;最后,完善环境政策工具实施的保障机制,加强环境政策工具的法制建设,构建环境友好型市场经济体系,促进环境社会治理体系的形成和发展。
[Abstract]:As an organic part of environmental policy, environmental policy tool is a bridge connecting the goal and result of environmental policy, and its choice greatly influences and restricts the effect of environmental governance. The government has adopted a variety of environmental policy tools to improve environmental problems, which has achieved certain results, but needs to be further improved. South Korea in environmental governance through the effective selection and implementation of environmental policy tools. In the field of environmental governance has achieved more obvious results, worthy of our reference. This paper uses literature analysis, comparative analysis, case analysis and other research methods to study the mandatory type, economic incentive type. Social voluntary environmental policy tools and the basis of choice, and introduced the main environmental policy tools and their implementation in China and South Korea. On the basis of this, three types of environmental policy tools of the two countries are introduced. Through the comparative analysis of the choice and implementation mechanism, it is found that the types of environmental policy tools, the choice of the main body, and the implementation of the main body are very similar, but due to the environmental management system, decision-making mechanism and the ability of social autonomy are different. There are some differences between the two countries in the choice of environmental policy tools, the degree of social participation and the implementation of the protection mechanism. This paper draws lessons from South Korea's effective experience of using environmental policy tools to govern the environment. According to the actual situation of our country, this paper puts forward the countermeasures to perfect the environmental policy tools of our country. First, improve all kinds of environmental policy tools; Secondly, we should perfect the choice mechanism of environmental policy tool, the decision-making mechanism and social participation mechanism of environmental policy tool selection. Thirdly, optimize the choice and combination of environmental policy tools according to certain principles; Finally, we should perfect the safeguard mechanism of implementing environmental policy tools, strengthen the legal system construction of environmental policy tools, construct an environment-friendly market economy system, and promote the formation and development of environmental and social governance system.
【学位授予单位】：燕山大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：X321

【参考文献】