党史人物评价中的“隐性”抹黑不应忽视
发布时间：2018-10-11 06:37
【摘要】：在党史人物评价中由于方法论错误所导致的以人论史、以言画人、以讹传讹等"隐性"抹黑,影响深远,危害很大。20世纪五六十年代中国发展道路的曲折并不是由于毛泽东"绝对自信"的性格,而是探索中难以避免的失误;脱离具体的语境,孤立地抓住领袖的某句话来断定其性格并进而推导其权力观,只能是以偏概全;所谓的"毛泽东指示高岗暗查刘少奇的历史"与事实不符,不加分析地以讹传讹会成为更大混乱的传播源。
[Abstract]:The "recessive" discredit caused by the wrong methodology in the evaluation of the party's historical figures, such as "theory of man", "painting people with words" and "inaccuracies", has a profound impact. The twists and turns of China's development path in the 1950s and 1960s were not due to Mao Zedong's character of "absolute self-confidence," but to unavoidable mistakes in exploration; they were divorced from the specific context. To grasp a certain sentence of a leader in isolation to determine his character and then to deduce his view of power can only be a partial overview; the so-called "Mao Zedong instruction Gao Gang to secretly investigate the history of Liu Shaoqi" is not in accordance with the facts. Unanalyzed misinformation can become a source of greater chaos.
【作者单位】： 辽宁省社会科学院;
【分类号】：D239
，
本文编号：2263214
[Abstract]:The "recessive" discredit caused by the wrong methodology in the evaluation of the party's historical figures, such as "theory of man", "painting people with words" and "inaccuracies", has a profound impact. The twists and turns of China's development path in the 1950s and 1960s were not due to Mao Zedong's character of "absolute self-confidence," but to unavoidable mistakes in exploration; they were divorced from the specific context. To grasp a certain sentence of a leader in isolation to determine his character and then to deduce his view of power can only be a partial overview; the so-called "Mao Zedong instruction Gao Gang to secretly investigate the history of Liu Shaoqi" is not in accordance with the facts. Unanalyzed misinformation can become a source of greater chaos.
【作者单位】： 辽宁省社会科学院;
【分类号】：D239
，
本文编号：2263214
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/dangjiandangzheng/2263214.html
