重构价值哲学:从价值判断出发

发布时间：2018-01-12 18:00

本文关键词：重构价值哲学:从价值判断出发　出处：《现代哲学》2015年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：价值判断是价值哲学的研究对象,分为原子性和复合性两大类。原子性价值判断具有简单明晰性,是复合性价值判断的来源。伦理规范无判断之义和判断形式,不是价值判断;价值判断无规范之义和规范形式,不具有规范性。价值判断是事实判断的一种类型,语法形式是S is P,适用命题逻辑的推理规则。应当句仅是伦理规范的语法形式。价值哲学的问题体系是:价值判断的含义、形式和形成规则,影响价值判断的因素,价值判断推理规则,价值判断与伦理规范和道德判断的关系等。运思路径是:事实判断(+心理意向+价值判断标准)→价值判断(+事实判断+行为意向)→伦理规范(+伦理判断标准)→伦理判断(+道德判断标准)→道德判断。
[Abstract]:Value judgment is the research object of philosophy of value, divided into atomic and compound two categories. Atomic value judgment is simple and clear, is the source of value judgment. The composite ethics without judgment righteousness and judgment forms, not a value judgment; no normative meaning and value judgment standard form, does not have the specification. Value judgment is a type of fact judgment, S is P is a grammatical form, apply the inference rules of propositional logic. It should only is the ethical norms grammatical form. Philosophy of value system is: to determine the value of meaning, form and rules of formation, influence factors of value judgment, value judgment rules of inference. Value judgment and ethical norms and moral judgment relationship. Thinking path is: factual judgment (+ + psychological intention value judgment standard), value judgment (+ + facts to determine the behavior intention), ethics (+ ethical criterion) Ethical judgment (+ moral judgment standard) - moral judgment.

【作者单位】：东南大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学一般项目“价值观的先验结构及其生成的内在程序研究”(12YJA720023)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：B82-0
【正文快照】： 一、“价值判断”内涵与外延的冲突长期以来,价值哲学都认为价值判断是自己的研究对象,因此,如何理解价值判断对价值哲学,乃至伦理学、道德学和所有社会科学都具有极其重要的意义。但笔者发现,人们对价值判断的理解存在着诸多根本性问题,且这些问题相互关联,牵一发而动全身,使

【参考文献】