批判中的反思:论《天堂车床》中两种技术伦理观的对峙与“中和”

发布时间：2018-04-12 18:32

本文选题：道家技术伦理 + 功利主义技术伦理观　；参考：《南华大学学报(社会科学版)》2016年04期

【摘要】：厄休拉·勒奎因(Ursula Le Guin,1929—)的《天堂车床》(1971)立足于道家的整体论视野,从诊断学视角,以疾病的隐喻,反转了成功与失败、真实与假象、技术进步与永恒自然的二元对立,有效地揭示了人类过分追求创造性与主体性之弊。小说不仅再现了道家技术观与当今西方社会"技术至上"观念的对峙,同时,也提出了技术专家面对的不仅是技术的高速进步,也肩负着维护社会秩序与"合乎自然"的宇宙秩序的责任。该小说提倡道家负责任的"无为"、"以道驭技"的技术伦理观,反对"英雄式"介入、力量滥用的美国当代功利主义技术伦理观,在当今技术"风险社会",无疑是具有深刻的现实意义。但鉴于现代技术的复杂性,应从整体论出发,平衡两种技术伦理观,"中和"两者的优势,以应对当今人类面临的生态危机、人口、种族、贫困等诸多问题。
[Abstract]:Ursula Le Guinn's Lathe of Paradise (1929-1929-1929-11) based on the holistic view of the Taoists, from the perspective of diagnostics, with the metaphor of disease, the binary opposites of success and failure, truth and illusion, technological progress and eternal nature are reversed.It effectively reveals the disadvantages of human being's excessive pursuit of creativity and subjectivity.The novel not only reproduces the confrontation between the Taoist view of technology and the idea of "technology first" in the western society, but also points out that the technical experts are facing not only the rapid progress of technology.Also shouldering the responsibility of maintaining social order and "natural" cosmic order.The novel advocates the responsible "inaction" of Taoism and the technical ethics of "controlling technology by Taoism", and opposes the "heroic" intervention and the abuse of power in contemporary American utilitarian technical ethics.In today's technological "risk society", there is no doubt a profound practical significance.However, in view of the complexity of modern technology, we should balance the advantages of the two kinds of technology ethics, "neutralize" and deal with the ecological crisis, population, race, poverty and so on.
【作者单位】：南华大学外国语学院;
【基金】：湖南省教育厅项目“选择的力量:对厄休拉·勒奎因作品的生态批评研究”资助(编号09C866)
【分类号】：B82-057;I712.074

【相似文献】