国际援助义务应如何认定——一种基于责任原则的分析进路
发布时间：2018-09-19 10:00
【摘要】：在讨论国际援助时,罗尔斯和一些世界主义者囿于一种"非此即彼式"的简单化进路,要么将其视为人道主义义务,要么视为正义的义务。这种进路因忽略了两种性质不同的义务在关注对象、援助目标以及优先性等方面的明显差异,容易造成理解上的偏颇,而转向一种基于责任原则的分析进路可有效避免这种弊端。依据该进路,在后果责任与补救责任的区分及其内在关联被正确认识的基础上,通过对导致国家贫困的根本原因的综合分析,国际援助义务的性质就得到合理认定。其到底是正义的还是人道的,这种进路不仅为国际援助义务的认定提供了依据,而且在理论上满足责任原则的适用性、判断标准的连贯性和平等观念的重要性,对国际援助实践具有启示意义。
[Abstract]:In discussing international aid, Rawls and some cosmopolitans were confined to a "one or the other" simplistic approach, either as a humanitarian obligation or as a duty of justice. This approach, which ignores the obvious differences between the two obligations of different nature in terms of object of concern, aid objectives and priorities, can easily lead to misunderstandings. Turning to an analytical approach based on the principle of responsibility can effectively avoid this malpractice. According to this approach, on the basis of the correct understanding of the distinction between the responsibility of consequence and the responsibility of remedy and their internal relations, the nature of international aid obligation is reasonably recognized through the comprehensive analysis of the root causes leading to national poverty. Whether it is just or humane, this approach not only provides a basis for the determination of the obligation of international assistance, but also theoretically meets the applicability of the principle of responsibility, the consistency of the judgment criteria and the importance of the concept of equality, It has enlightening significance to the practice of international aid.
【作者单位】： 南京工业大学;南京大学哲学系;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目(12BKS009)
【分类号】：B82-051
，
本文编号：2249805
[Abstract]:In discussing international aid, Rawls and some cosmopolitans were confined to a "one or the other" simplistic approach, either as a humanitarian obligation or as a duty of justice. This approach, which ignores the obvious differences between the two obligations of different nature in terms of object of concern, aid objectives and priorities, can easily lead to misunderstandings. Turning to an analytical approach based on the principle of responsibility can effectively avoid this malpractice. According to this approach, on the basis of the correct understanding of the distinction between the responsibility of consequence and the responsibility of remedy and their internal relations, the nature of international aid obligation is reasonably recognized through the comprehensive analysis of the root causes leading to national poverty. Whether it is just or humane, this approach not only provides a basis for the determination of the obligation of international assistance, but also theoretically meets the applicability of the principle of responsibility, the consistency of the judgment criteria and the importance of the concept of equality, It has enlightening significance to the practice of international aid.
【作者单位】： 南京工业大学;南京大学哲学系;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目(12BKS009)
【分类号】：B82-051
，
本文编号：2249805
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/falvlunlilunwen/2249805.html
