当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 道德伦理论文 >

把结果论丢在后面

发布时间:2019-02-28 18:59
【摘要】:本报告挑战了下述陈词滥调——在结果论和义务论之间可以作出真正有效的理论选择,同时它论证了道义论比结果论的基本洞见更加深刻。以费希特的伦理学理论为例,证明它与亚里士多德实践观的一致性,本报告认为,所有行为都因其自身之故才是值得选择的,对结果的评价必须取决于由值得选择的行为所设置的目的。因此,在按照正确行为而选择的行为与按照最佳结果而选择的行为之间,最终不应该有什么分歧。在某些情况下,一种方法比另一种方法可能有启发性的优势,但每种方法也都可能会犯视角错误。结果论应被丢在后面,但不是彻底丢掉,而是像火车车尾的守车,只要被正确的道义论引擎牵引着,它就适得其所。
[Abstract]:The present report challenges the clich 茅 s that a truly effective theoretical choice can be made between the doctrine of results and the doctrine of obligation, and it demonstrates that moralism is more profound than the fundamental insight of the doctrine of results. Taking Fichte's ethical theory as an example to prove its consistency with Aristotle's view of practice, this report argues that all actions are worth choosing for their own reasons. The evaluation of the outcome must depend on the purpose set by the behavior worthy of choice. Therefore, there should be no difference between the behavior chosen according to the right behavior and the behavior chosen according to the best result. In some cases, one method may have an enlightening advantage over another, but each method may also make a visual error. Result theory should be left behind, but not completely lost, but like the rear of the train, as long as it is pulled by the correct moral engine, it is just right.
【作者单位】: 印第安纳大学;湘潭大学哲学系;
【基金】:教育部人文社科研究项目(项目编号:11YJA720007)的阶段性成果
【分类号】:B82-067


本文编号:2432078

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/falvlunlilunwen/2432078.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户b85f8***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com