以保安处分制度替代劳动教养

发布时间：2018-05-06 17:41

本文选题：劳动教养 + 保安处分　；参考：《厦门大学》2006年硕士论文

【摘要】： 劳动教养在我国维护社会治安秩序,教育、挽救违法和轻微犯罪行为人,预防和减少违法犯罪方面发挥了重要作用。随着我国法治化的推进和人权保障观念的确立,其法理上的矛盾、程序上的缺失以及实践中的问题日益显现。在目前改革劳动教养制度的讨论中,有行政化、独立化、犯罪化、保安处分化等四种思路。保安处分在价值取向和功能上和劳动教养较为相似。本文认为以保安处分制度替代劳动教养在我国具有可行性,主张建立我国强制教育矫治处分制度,定性为刑事性保安处分单行法,并将我国目前限制人身自由的劳动教养、收容教养、收容教育、强制戒毒吸收到强制教育矫治处分中。正文由前言、主文、结论三部分组成,主文分为五章。第一章,概述劳动教养制度的历史沿革及现状。第二章,分析指出劳动教养存在着合法性根基动摇、法律地位缺失、背离法治原则、人权保障机制不足、与我国应承担的国际人权公约义务相冲突等问题。第三章,对劳动教养进行了价值分析,介绍评析劳动教养行政化、独立化、犯罪化、保安处分化等四种改革思路。第四章,简要介绍保安处分的理论及立法实践,从保安处分和劳动教养的功能比较、解决劳动教养存在的法治和人权保障问题、可操作性等三个方面对保安处分替代劳动教养的可行性进行了分析。第五章,建议以刑事性保安处分为属性立法,建立强制教育矫治处分制度,适用于有违法行为事实并有人身危险性的人,贯彻教育、矫治、社会防卫的理念,着眼于被处分人的改善和回归社会,体现限制人身自由的特征,实行相对不定期原则以消除行为人的人身危险性所需要的时间来决定强制教育矫治处分的期限,把决定权纳入司法审查范围由法院决定。
[Abstract]:Reeducation through labor plays an important role in maintaining public order, educating, saving the perpetrators of illegal and minor crimes, and preventing and reducing illegal crimes. With the advancement of the rule of law and the establishment of the concept of human rights protection in our country, the contradictions in legal theory, the lack of procedure and the problems in practice are becoming more and more obvious. In the discussion of reforming the system of reeducation through labor, there are four ways of thinking: administration, independence, crime and division of security department. Security measures are similar to reeducation through labor in value orientation and function. This paper holds that it is feasible to replace reeducation through labor with the system of security measures in our country, and advocates the establishment of the system of compulsory education and correction of punishment in our country, which is characterized as a single law of criminal security measures, and reeducates through labour which restricts the personal freedom of our country at present. Receiving education, receiving education and compulsory detoxification are absorbed into compulsory educational treatment. The text consists of three parts: preface, main text and conclusion. The main text is divided into five chapters. The first chapter summarizes the history and present situation of reeducation through labor system. In the second chapter, the author points out that the legitimacy of reeducation through labour is shaken, the legal status is lacking, the principle of rule of law is deviated from, the human rights guarantee mechanism is insufficient, and it conflicts with the obligations of international human rights conventions that our country should undertake. The third chapter analyzes the value of reeducation through labor, and introduces four kinds of reform ideas: administration, independence, crime and division of security department. The fourth chapter briefly introduces the theory and legislative practice of security measures, from the comparison of the functions of security measures and re-education through labor, it solves the problems of rule of law and human rights protection in re-education through labor. The feasibility of security measures as a substitute for reeducation through labor is analyzed in three aspects, such as maneuverability. In the fifth chapter, it is suggested that the criminal security department should be divided into attribute legislation, establish the system of compulsory education correction and punishment, be applicable to those who have the fact of illegal behavior and have personal danger, and carry out the concept of education, correction and social defense. Focusing on the improvement and return to society of the person who has been punished, reflecting the characteristics of restricting personal freedom, and carrying out the relative indefinite principle to determine the time needed to eliminate the personal danger of the perpetrator to determine the time limit for compulsory education and correction of punishment, It is up to the court to decide to bring the decision into the scope of judicial review.
【学位授予单位】：厦门大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2006
【分类号】：D926.8

【引证文献】