职务犯罪侦查权的监督与制约机制研究

发布时间：2018-05-07 20:19

本文选题：职务犯罪侦查权 + 监督　；参考：《中国政法大学》2008年硕士论文

【摘要】： 职务犯罪作为严重危害国家稳定的犯罪行为,对其进行严格打击是我国特色社会主义建设的必然。我国将职务犯罪侦查权赋予人民检察院,是在综合我国法治现状和顺应世界反腐趋势的基础上做出的英明抉择。然而,由于检察机关同时还是我国的法律监督机关,独立的司法主体,因而司法实践中一直存在着对职务犯罪侦查权的监督制约薄弱的问题,导致目前职务犯罪侦查中滥用侦查权力、侵犯犯罪嫌疑人人权等违法现象的频频发生。其主要原因是,目前国内缺乏对职务犯罪侦查权监督与制约机制的全面系统研究,用于指导工作实践。为完善社会主义法治,构建社会和谐,对职务犯罪侦查权的监督制约机制进行一次系统全面的研究分析十分必要。有鉴于此,本文拟从服务于社会的现实需要,结合现有理论研究基础,在分析现存问题矛盾和应用权力制衡理论的基础上,对现有职务犯罪侦查权的监督与制约机制进行介绍和分析,并提出完善和改革方案,以期对我国职务犯罪侦查现状的改善有所助益。本文除去前言部分,共分为五章、两大部分。其中,第一章为第一部分,是全文的总论;第二章至第五章为第二部分,是全文的分论。第一章为职务犯罪侦查权的监督和制约机制的概述,该部分将从分析职务犯罪侦查权的监督与制约机制的相关概念开始,详细介绍和分析了职务犯罪侦查监督制约的历史沿革、现状及实践中存在的问题,着重阐述了本文改革和完善职务犯罪侦查权的监督制约机制的原理,在结合此次研究目的和思路基础上,提出应当从职务犯罪侦查权的外部权力监督机制、内部权力制约机制、权利制约机制及司法制度保障等方面构筑监督与制约机制的理论构想。第二章是职务犯罪侦查权的外部权力监督机制之重构部分,该章详细介绍了我国职务犯罪侦查权的人大机关的监督、政协的监督、党内的监督、人民法院的监督的现状和问题,并积极寻找改革完善之法;重点探讨了人民监督员制度这项新型监督方式。第三章是职务犯罪侦查权的内部制约机制的完善部分,该章在详细分析实践中存在的问题和现有理论成果的基础上,主张从加强上级检察机关制约和强化同一检察机关内部制约两个方面完善其内部权力制约机制。第四章是职务犯罪侦查权的权利制约建设部分,该章从以权利行使制约权力运行的目的出发,建议从职务犯罪侦查中的人权保障和强化人民群众与新闻媒体的舆论监督作用两个方面,对职务犯罪侦查权进行制约。第五章是文章的最后部分,建议从司法制度的角度对职务犯罪侦查权的行使进行制约,即以健全非法证据排除规则,对职务犯罪侦查取得的证据进行选择,以达到制约侦查权的目的。职务犯罪侦查权的监督与制约机制是保障职务犯罪侦查权顺利合法的实施的重要体系,它对于完善我国社会主义法治,构建和谐社会将起到核心作用。本文从理论的层面对我国职务犯罪侦查权的监督与制约机制进行了积极有益的探讨,希望能够对规范我国职务犯罪侦查权的行使和改善司法现状尽一臂之力。
[Abstract]:As a criminal act that seriously endangers the stability of the country, the duty crime is a necessity for the construction of our country's characteristic socialism. The power of investigating the crime of duty crime is given to the people's Procuratorate, which is the wise choice made on the basis of the status of the rule of law in China and the trend of complying with the world's anti-corruption. It is also the legal supervision organ of our country and the independent judiciary, so there has been a weak supervision and restriction on the investigation power of the duty crime in the judicial practice, which leads to the frequent occurrence of the abuse of the power of investigation and the violation of the human rights of the suspects in the investigation of the duty crime. The comprehensive and systematic study of the supervision and restriction mechanism of the right to investigate the duty crime is used to guide the work practice. It is necessary to carry out a systematic and comprehensive study and analysis of the supervision and restriction mechanism of the right to investigate the duty crime by the purpose of perfecting the socialist rule of law, constructing the social harmony and the supervision and restriction mechanism of the right of investigating the duty crime. On the basis of the theoretical research, on the basis of the analysis of the existing problems and the theory of applying power balance, this paper introduces and analyzes the supervision and restriction mechanism of the current investigation right of the duty crime, and puts forward the improvement and reform plan, in order to help the improvement of the investigation status of the duty crime in our country.
Apart from the preface, this article is divided into five chapters and two parts. The first chapter is the first part, which is the total theory of the full text; the second to the fifth chapter is the second part of the full text. The first chapter is a summary of the supervision and restriction mechanism of the right of investigation of the duty crime, and this part will be from the analysis of the supervision and restriction mechanism of the investigative power of the duty crime. The related concept begins, introduces and analyzes the historical evolution of the supervision and restriction of the investigation of the duty crime, the present situation and the existing problems in practice, and emphatically expounds the principle of the reform and improvement of the supervision and restriction mechanism of the investigative power of the duty crime. On the basis of the purpose and thought of this study, the author puts forward that it should be from the outside investigation right of the duty crime. The second chapter is the reconstruction part of the external power supervision mechanism for the investigation power of the duty crime. This chapter introduces the supervision of the people's Congress of the investigative power of the duty crime in our country and the supervision of the CPPCC. The supervision of the party, the supervision of the people's court and the problems of the supervision of the people's court, and actively looking for the law of reform and perfection, and focusing on the new supervision mode of the people's supervisor system. The third chapter is the perfect part of the internal restriction mechanism of the power of investigating the duty crime, and this chapter is in detail the problems existing in the practice and the basis of the existing theoretical results. On the basis of it, it is advocated to improve the internal power restriction mechanism from two aspects: strengthening the procuratorial organs of higher authorities and strengthening the internal restriction of the same procuratorial organs. The fourth chapter is the right restriction and construction part of the right to investigate the duty crime. The chapter proposes the protection of human rights in the investigation of the duty crime from the purpose of exercising the power to restrict the operation of power. This is the last part of the article. The fifth chapter is the last part of the article. It is proposed to restrict the exercise of the right of investigation of the duty crime from the angle of the judicial system, that is, to choose the rule of eliminating the illegal evidence and choose the evidence obtained by the investigation of the duty crime. In order to achieve the purpose of restricting the power of investigation.
The supervision and restriction mechanism of the investigative power of the duty crime is an important system to ensure the smooth and lawful implementation of the right of investigation of the duty crime. It will play a core role in perfecting the socialist rule of law and building a harmonious society in our country. It is hoped that it will help to standardize the exercise of investigation power and improve the judicial status in China.

【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：D918

【相似文献】