地方政府与基层实践——一个协商民主的理论分析框架

发布时间：2018-03-04 05:31

本文选题：基层协商民主　切入点：地方政府　出处：《经济社会体制比较》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：协商民主在中国的基层实践遵循的是嵌入式的生长路径,高度仰赖地方政府的制度性供给,也就必然受其目标理念、组织结构以及政治环境等要素的影响。在体制性塑造下,基层协商民主实践整体呈现出民主与治理间的徘徊与整合,表现为当前各地以"协商民主"为名的基层实践存在回应型、自治型和咨询型协商三种不同类型;协商制度设计和运行中更多地"利用"体制内资源和手段而非"探索"科学的协商技术;在协商参与者的选择上沿袭着以群体为本位的代表逻辑,在代表类型和范围上有所拓展;推动实践的主导力量由政治精英扩展到例如人大、政协等体制内组织,它们由此激活了原本被"虚置"的政治权力。当前的基层协商实践呈现出本土性特色,但仍需完善与拓展才可能实现国家与社会相互依赖的"双向民主化"转型。
[Abstract]:The grassroots practice of deliberative democracy in China follows the embedded growth path. Depending highly on the institutional supply of local governments, it is bound to be influenced by its objective concept, organizational structure and political environment. The whole practice of grass-roots consultation democracy presents the wandering and integration between democracy and governance, which shows that there are three different types of grass-roots practice in the name of "deliberative democracy", autonomous type and consultation type. In the design and operation of the consultation system, the resources and means within the system are more "utilized" than the "explore" scientific negotiation techniques, and the representative logic based on the group is followed in the selection of consultation participants. In terms of the type and scope of representation, the leading force in promoting practice has been extended from the political elite to organizations within systems such as the National people's Congress and the Chinese people's political Consultative Conference. From this, they activate the political power that was originally "empty". The current practice of grass-roots consultation presents its local characteristics, but it still needs to be perfected and expanded in order to realize the transformation of "bi-directional democratization", which the state and society depend on each other.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学国家发展与战略研究院;北京大学政府管理学院;
【基金】：中国博士后科学基金面上资助课题“基层协商民主的运行与制度化研究”(项目编号:2015M580161)
【分类号】：D621

【相似文献】