安哥拉内战与美中关系——基于美国“联华援安”战略始末的考察

发布时间：2018-06-10 08:32

本文选题：安哥拉内战 + 美中关系　；参考：《四川师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年01期

【摘要】：1974年春,安哥拉民族解放运动提速,源自族群纷争的安哥拉内战于次年爆发,并升级为美、苏、中等大国牵涉其中的全球冷战的组成部分。自1974年初,中国对"安哥拉民族解放阵线"(简称"安解阵")的军援提速,以制衡苏联扶助的"安哥拉人民解放运动";美国也开启秘密援助"安解阵",但规模有限、成效一般,白宫因此通过纽约渠道及高层访华向中方多次提出"联华援安"建议。鉴于对外战略转轨,中国政府并未迎合该建议,并于1975年底结束援助"安解阵"。美国"联华援安"虽流产,但美中就后续涉安问题仍保持配合。安哥拉危机体现出内战国际化与冷战本土化的特点。就此议题的美中坦诚互动与美方所凸显的联华渴求,客观上增强了美中双边的政治互信与战略共识,在以有限合作为准绳的美中抗苏伙伴关系形成进程中起到了特殊作用。
[Abstract]:In the spring of 1974, the Angolan National Liberation Movement speeded up, and the civil war, which originated from ethnic strife, broke out the following year and escalated into the United States, the Soviet Union, and the moderate powers involved in the global cold war component. Since the beginning of 1974, China's military assistance to the "Front de lib 茅 ration nationale de Angola" (FNLA) has been speeded up to counterbalance the Soviet-supported "people's Liberation Movement of Angola". The United States has also launched secret aid to the "Front for the Liberation of Angola", but on a limited scale and with modest results. Therefore, the White House, through New York channels and high-level visit to China, repeatedly put forward the "United China Aid Security" proposal. In view of the strategic transition, the Chinese government did not pander to the proposal, and ended its aid to the Front at the end of 1975. Although the United States "China Aid Security" miscarriage, but the United States and China on the subsequent security issues still maintain cooperation. The Angolan crisis embodies the characteristics of the internationalization of the civil war and the localization of the cold war. The frank interaction between the United States and China on this issue and the outstanding desire of the United States have objectively strengthened the political mutual trust and strategic consensus between the United States and China, and played a special role in the process of forming the US-China anti-Soviet partnership with limited cooperation as the yardstick.
【作者单位】：中山大学历史学系;
【分类号】：D829.712

【相似文献】