西方如何隐蔽性建构国际制度性话语权——“世界治理指数”的剖析及其启示

发布时间：2018-07-05 14:18

本文选题：国际制度性话语权 + 世界治理指数　；参考：《探索》2017年03期

【摘要】：在政治学和国际关系领域,一些西方国家已将指数的设计和发布视为传播话语体系和政治霸权的表达工具。世界银行开发的世界治理指数被公认为是西方主流治理指数中科学性高、影响力广的综合指标之一。通过特定的数据筛选标准、数据来源、数据处理方法和数据公布形式等研发环节,世界治理指数的研制者将西方价值观十分隐蔽地加入到指标评估的过程中。世界治理指数本质上并非秉持价值中立的立场。世界治理指数隐蔽加入价值观判断的行为,不仅逾越了世行机构"行为不能涉及其他政治化"的工作红线,而且实际上形成了一种国际制度性话语"霸权"。对此,中国一方面应该积极主动地参与世界治理指数的完善工作,不断获取国际制度性话语权。另一方面,中国还应该构建本土国家治理指数,突破西方指数霸权的束缚。
[Abstract]:In the field of political science and international relations, some western countries have regarded the design and publication of index as an expression tool to spread the discourse system and political hegemony. The world governance index developed by the World Bank is recognized as one of the most scientific and influential comprehensive indexes in the western mainstream governance index. Through the research and development of specific data screening criteria, data sources, data processing methods and data publication forms, the developers of the World Governance Index add western values to the process of index evaluation very covert. The World Governance Index is not essentially value-neutral. The hidden behavior of the World Governance Index to add value judgment not only exceeds the red line of the Bank's work of "behavior cannot involve other politicization", but also forms a kind of international institutional discourse "hegemony". Therefore, on the one hand, China should actively participate in the improvement of the world governance index and continuously acquire the right of international institutional discourse. On the other hand, China should also construct the local governance index and break the shackles of western index hegemony.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学政治学研究院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“非西方国家政治发展道路研究”(15ZDA033),项目负责人:谭融华东政法大学“法治政府评估指标与评估体系研究校级研究项目”(15HZK014),项目负责人:游腾飞;华东政法大学政治学研究院“华与罗世界文明与比较政治研究项目”(HDZ005),项目负责人:高奇琦
【分类号】：D509

【相似文献】