清华简《系年》与晋、楚邦交策略研究
发布时间:2018-04-25 04:18
本文选题:清华简《系年》 + 东周 ; 参考:《烟台大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:东周时期,邦交关系成为影响国家命运的重要因素。本文利用新发现的竹简资料——清华简《系年》,对东周时期的邦交活动进行探讨。首先,对目前为止学术界对《系年》的研究成果进行了梳理,得知《系年》属于战国中期作品,是一部纪事本末体的史书。其次,在此基础上,对可与《系年》对读的其他史书,如《春秋》、《左传》、《竹书纪年》的基本情况作了进一步梳理,,从而以这些史书为坐标,对比《系年》的特点,论述了《系年》的性质,得出了《系年》晚于《左传》,且在史观方面,《系年》理性客观,与《左传》的用儒家观点评价历史及《竹书纪年》中的多神话传说等具有鲜明的区别。最后对《系年》记载的东周邦交关系进行较深入的史学探讨。
[Abstract]:During the Eastern Zhou Dynasty, diplomatic relations became an important factor affecting the fate of the country. Based on the newly discovered bamboo slips, Qinghua bamboo slips, this paper discusses the diplomatic activities during the Eastern Zhou Dynasty. First of all, the author combs the research achievements of the academic circles so far, and finds out that it belongs to the middle period of the warring States period and is a historical book in the end of the chronicle. Secondly, on this basis, the basic situation of other historical books that can be read in conjunction with "Department year", such as "Spring and Autumn period", "Zuo Zhuan" and "year of the Bamboo Book", is further combed, so as to compare the characteristics of "Department year" with these historical books. This paper discusses the nature of "Department year", and draws a conclusion that "Department year" is later than "Zuo Zhuan", and in the view of history, "Department year" is rational and objective, which is different from "Zuo Zhuan" in evaluating history with Confucian point of view and many myths and legends in "Bamboo Book Chronicle". Finally, the relationship between the Eastern Zhou Dynasty and the Eastern Zhou Dynasty is discussed.
【学位授予单位】:烟台大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:K877.5
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 吴春明;;“环中国海”海洋文化的土著生成与汉人传承论纲[J];复旦学报(社会科学版);2011年01期
2 石艳芳;试论春秋时期朝聘的特点[J];贵州文史丛刊;2001年01期
3 陈恩林;论春秋五伯的争霸战略[J];吉林大学社会科学学报;1995年04期
4 周到;;河南息县古遗址的调查[J];考古通讯;1958年03期
5 郑春生;;朝聘礼制管窥[J];上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1991年03期
6 何光岳;息国考[J];史学月刊;1988年06期
7 陈昌远;古息国考辨——河南古国史研究之四[J];史学月刊;1990年06期
8 刘丽;;重耳流亡路线考[J];深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版);2012年02期
9 廖名春;;清华简《系年》管窥[J];深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版);2012年03期
10 李守奎;肖攀;;清华简《系年》中的“■”字及“■”之构形[J];华夏文化论坛;2012年02期
本文编号:1799718
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/kgx/1799718.html