在中国的加内塞和毗那夜迦

发布时间：2018-06-04 02:14

本文选题：象头神 + 密教　；参考：《文物》2017年02期

【摘要】：正宗教图像的演变与教义的发展密切相关,也涉及宗教文化的传播与演变,因此对图像的正确阐释,应注意宗教发展之脉络。从印度到中国,象头神从“加内塞”到“毗那夜迦”之变化,正是反映了这种情况。而对它们图像的认定,又表现出佛教和婆罗门教在中国的一些纠葛。试说如下。一在中国,同样是作为“象头人身”的神yG,毗那夜迦(Vināyaka)多被汉文佛教经籍所提及,而图像的原型则来自于加内塞(Ganesa)。这一切得从头说起。动物作为生命体不仅与人类息息相关,而
[Abstract]:The evolution of positive religious images is closely related to the development of religious doctrine, and also involves the spread and evolution of religious culture. Therefore, attention should be paid to the context of religious development in the correct interpretation of images. From India to China, the change of head gods from Ganesha to Pina Nga is a reflection of this situation. The recognition of their images shows some disputes between Buddhism and Brahminism in China. Try saying the following. In China, the god YGan, Vin Yaka, who is also a "elephant head", is often mentioned by the Buddhist scriptures in Chinese, and the prototype of the image is from Ganesaan. All this has to start from scratch. Animals are not only closely related to human beings, but also to human beings.
【作者单位】：复旦大学文史研究院;

【相似文献】