从古文字角度谈《夏商周:从神话到史实》的若干问题

发布时间：2018-06-04 03:18

本文选题：夏商周 + 辞例　；参考：《历史研究》2016年01期

【摘要】：中山大学珠江学者讲座教授、历史人类学研究中心研究员郭静云《夏商周:从神话到史实》(上海古籍出版社2013年版)一书出版后,在学术界颇受关注,不乏歧见。2015年,我刊收到厦门大学中文系副教授张惟捷的投稿《从古文字角度谈〈夏商周:从神话到史实〉的若干问题》。该文主要从古文字学角度对郭著提出批评,认为郭著诸多新论点所依据的古文字证据存在问题,亟待厘清,遂从18个方面逐一加以考察辩驳。根据规定,编辑部请专家对投稿进行了匿名外审并获通过,同时将稿件发给郭静云教授征求意见。鼓励学术争鸣,强调学术创新,是推动中国学术走向繁荣的重要手段,也是《历史研究》长期以来秉持的办刊风格。为体现学术争鸣的公平性,我们将郭静云教授关于张惟捷文的简要回应一并刊发,以利于相关研究的进一步深化。
[Abstract]:Guo Jingyun, Professor of the Pearl River Scholar at Sun Yat-sen University and researcher at the Center for Historical Anthropology, Guo Jingyun, "Xia Shangzhou: from Myth to Historical fact" (Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, 2013), has attracted considerable attention in academic circles, and there is no shortage of differences of opinion in 2015. I received a contribution from Zhang Weijie, Associate Professor of Chinese Department of Xiamen University, on "Xia Shang Zhou: from mythology to Historical fact" from the perspective of ancient Chinese characters. This paper mainly criticizes Guo's works from the perspective of ancient writing, and thinks that there are some problems in the ancient written evidence on which many of Guo's new arguments are based, which need to be clarified urgently, and then it is examined and refuted one by one from 18 aspects. According to the regulations, the editorial department asked experts to conduct an anonymous external review of the contribution and was approved, and sent the manuscript to Professor Guo Jingyun for comment. Encouraging academic contending and emphasizing academic innovation is an important means to promote the prosperity of Chinese academic, and it is also a long-held style of publishing in History Studies. In order to reflect the fairness of academic contention, we will publish Professor Guo Jingyun's brief response on Zhang Weijie's article, so as to further deepen the relevant research.
【作者单位】：厦门大学中文系;
【基金】：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(20720151277) 福建省中青年教师教育科研项目资助(JAS150076)
【分类号】：K877.1

【相似文献】