论辩的形式化研究

发布时间：2018-04-09 23:14

本文选题：论辩　切入点：形式　出处：《哲学动态》2016年08期

【摘要】：现代逻辑的形式化进路不依赖任何实质规则,因此针对不同领域中论辩的完全形式化研究遭受了质疑与挑战。洛仑岑、辛迪卡、雷斯切、巴斯、克罗贝、汉布林、伍兹、沃尔顿等学者指出,可以从非形式逻辑意义上的形式出发研究论辩的形式化,并以此建立了各自的形式论辩系统。本文以"形式化"等几个关键术语的解释为起点,将各种形式论辩系统归结为两大类型,即洛仑岑式系统和汉布林式系统。分析、比较这些论辩系统,可使论证过程和理性批判更加规范化、标准化,并为建立法律论证的逻辑模型提供依据。
[Abstract]:The formal approach of modern logic does not depend on any substantive rules, so the complete formal research on the debate in different fields has been challenged and challenged.Lorenzen, Syndica, Lecce, Bath, Crobe, Hambling, Woods, Walton and other scholars point out that we can study the formalization of debate from the non-formal logic sense, and establish their own formal debate system.Based on the explanation of some key terms such as "formalization", this paper puts forward two types of formal debate systems, namely, Lorentsen system and Hamburin type system.The analysis and comparison of these argumentation systems can make the process of argumentation and rational criticism more standardized and provide the basis for establishing the logical model of legal argumentation.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学人文学院;
【基金】：2015年国家社会科学基金一般项目“法律证据推理的归纳概率逻辑研究”(15BZX084)资助
【分类号】：B812

【相似文献】