命题态度的逻辑结构研究

发布时间：2018-06-28 05:16

本文选题：命题态度 + 弗雷格疑难　；参考：《湘潭大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：命题态度是语言学、语言哲学、心灵哲学、认知逻辑、人工智能知识表征和信息经济学等领域中的重要研究课题。对于命题态度结构的不同方案，都面临着许多的困境。其中最核心的问题就是：弗雷格疑难，它统领了命题态度的相关问题研究，如：态度形式化问题、态度归属问题（本体）、态度内容表征（语义）等。本论文主要是从命题态度的语形和语义两方面着手，以福多的理论标准为指南，对命题态度结构研究做一个系统的考察，比较不同处理方案之间的优缺点，试图给出一个更为合理的方案。弗雷格疑难的提出表明命题态度的逻辑结构研究已经开启，而其衍生出来的两个重要的变体：克里普克的信念之谜以及理查德疑难，表明命题态度的逻辑结构研究进一步深入。弗雷格疑难表明同一置换律在晦暗语境中失效，而克里普克信念之谜表明在晦暗语境中不用同一置换律也会产生疑难，而理查德疑难表明透明语境中同一置换律也会失效，因而该疑难更加具有挑战性。命题态度的逻辑语形结构主要围绕主体-态度-语句这三者之间的关系来处理，主要有几种方法：A.态度是谓词。这种处理的结果会直接导致逻辑矛盾。B.态度是算子。算子的观点直接导致晦暗性指称和透明性指称的区分，同时引入了内涵个体和全能主体，这些都和直觉不吻合。C.主体-态度-内容是范畴类型运算。由Montague（1974）提出而发展。在逻辑上，语形和语义一般是一一对应的。因而，，命题态度的逻辑语义结构相应于上述三种语形处理有着相应的语义解释：A.复合语义。这是弗雷格的语义基本原则。B.可能世界语义。由辛迪卡和克里普克诸多学者提出，带来了新的本体承诺。C.范畴类型逻辑语义。逻辑学中的一些问题如逻辑全能问题和认知悖论，认识论中的认知封闭原则问题，都和弗雷格疑难问题关联，命题态度理论也许能够提供一个解决的视角。
[Abstract]:Propositional attitude is an important research topic in the fields of linguistics, philosophy of language, philosophy of mind, cognitive logic, artificial intelligence knowledge representation and information economics. The different schemes of propositional attitude structure are faced with many difficulties. The most important problem is Frege's problem, which leads the research of propositional attitude, such as formalization of attitude, ownership of attitude (ontology), representation of attitude content (semantics) and so on. This thesis mainly focuses on the morphologies and semantics of propositional attitudes, taking Fudor's theoretical standards as the guide, and makes a systematic investigation on the structure of propositional attitudes, and compares the advantages and disadvantages of different treatment schemes. Try to come up with a more reasonable plan. The introduction of Frege's problem indicates that the study of the logical structure of propositional attitude has been opened, and the two important variants derived from it, the riddle of Kripke's belief and the difficulty of Richard's, indicate that the study of the logical structure of propositional attitude is further studied. Frege's difficulty indicates that the same permutation law is invalid in the dark context, while the riddle of Kripke's belief shows that the same permutation law is difficult without the same permutation law in the dark context, while Richard's difficulty indicates that the same permutation law will also fail in the transparent context. The problem is therefore more challenging. The logical figurative structure of propositional attitude mainly deals with the relationship between subject-attitude and sentence, and there are several ways to deal with it: A. Attitude is a predicate. The result of this process is a direct logical contradiction. B. Attitude is an operator. The viewpoint of operator directly leads to the distinction between obscurity reference and transparent reference, and at the same time introduces the connotative individual and the omnipotent subject, which are inconsistent with the intuition. Subject-attitude-content is category type operation. Developed by Montague (1974). Logically, morphologies and semantics are generally one-to-one correspondence. Therefore, the logical semantic structure of propositional attitude is corresponding to the above three morphologies and has a corresponding semantic interpretation: A. Compound semantics. This is Frege's basic semantic principle. Possible world semantics. Proposed by many scholars such as Syndica and Kripke, it brings new ontological commitment. Category type logic semantics. Some problems in logic, such as logic omnipotent problem and cognitive paradox, cognitive closure principle in epistemology, are all related to Frege's problem. Propositional attitude theory may provide a perspective to solve the problem.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：B812

【参考文献】