论科技异化的产生与克服
发布时间:2018-01-06 12:20
本文关键词:论科技异化的产生与克服 出处:《燕山大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
更多相关文章: 劳动异化 科技异化 意识形态 异化克服 科学发展观
【摘要】:科学技术的进步不仅改变了人们的生活和生存方式,同时也不断的改造着人自身。尤其是在资本主义社会中,科学技术为资本所绑架,导致了科学技术的异化。科学技术不仅没有为人的解放和发展服务,反而成为阻碍人的解放和发展的异己力量威胁着人类的生存。 该文主要分三个部分对科学技术异化产生的原因、西方马克主义异化理论以及关于科学技术异化的解决方法进行研究。首先,分析科学技术异化产生的历史根源和社会背景。私有制导致了劳动异化,而劳动异化又引发科学技术的异化,因此私有制是成为科学技术异化的根源。劳动分工无疑又加深了科学技术的异化。其次,主要叙述西方马克思主义科技异化理论。随着工业社会的发展,科学技术异化在新的历史环境中发展到了新的阶段。在这一阶段西方马克思主义对此作了详尽的阐释,并为解决科学技术异化问题提出了令人深思的解决方案。最后,虽然西方马克思主义提出了解决科学技术异化问题的种种方案,但是仍然难免有其局限之处。该文最终站在马克思主义哲学的立场之上,通过对西方马克思主义的借鉴提出解决科学技术问题的一些见解,最终阐明科学技术的发展与人类进步之间的内在关系。 该文采用文献研究法,比较研究法和归纳与演绎相结合的方法,得出结论科学技术异化是由劳动异化引起的,劳动异化和科技异化都是人类社会发展史上不可逾越的特定阶段。西马在解决科学技术异化问题时抛弃了具体的社会环境,,认为科学技术异化问题是由科学技术本身发展的不合理性引起的,具有很大的局限性。该文站在先贤的研究基础之上指出,要解决科学技术异化问题,既要着眼于长远,又不能忽视当下,要把对社会制度的批判和在科学技术的发展中坚持以人为本结合起来。除此之外,我们也应当加强对科学技术发展的引导和规范。
[Abstract]:The progress of science and technology has not only changed people's life and way of life, but also constantly reformed themselves. Especially in capitalist society, science and technology is kidnapped by capital. Science and technology not only do not serve for the liberation and development of human beings, but also become the dissident forces that hinder the emancipation and development of human beings, which threaten the survival of human beings. This article mainly divides into three parts to study the reason of the alienation of science and technology, the western theory of alienation of Mark and the solution of the alienation of science and technology. This paper analyzes the historical origin and social background of the alienation of science and technology. The private ownership leads to the alienation of labor, and the alienation of labor leads to the alienation of science and technology. Therefore, private ownership is the root of science and technology alienation. The division of labor undoubtedly deepens the alienation of science and technology. Secondly, it mainly narrates the western Marxist theory of science and technology alienation with the development of industrial society. The alienation of science and technology has developed to a new stage in the new historical environment. Finally, although Western Marxism put forward a variety of solutions to solve the problem of alienation of science and technology. However, there are still some limitations. This article finally stands on the standpoint of Marxist philosophy and puts forward some ideas to solve the problems of science and technology through the reference of western Marxism. Finally, the internal relationship between the development of science and technology and human progress is clarified. This paper adopts the method of literature research, comparative research and the combination of induction and deduction, and draws the conclusion that the alienation of science and technology is caused by the alienation of labor. The alienation of labor and technology is an insurmountable stage in the history of the development of human society. Sima abandoned the concrete social environment in solving the problem of alienation of science and technology. This paper points out that the dissimilation of science and technology is caused by the irrationality of the development of science and technology itself and has great limitations. This paper points out that the problem of alienation of science and technology should be solved on the basis of the research of the forefathers. We should not only focus on the long term, but also not ignore the present, we should combine the criticism of social system with the people-oriented in the development of science and technology. We should also strengthen the guidance and standardization of the development of science and technology.
【学位授予单位】:燕山大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:A811
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 荆筱槐;陈凡;;芬伯格的技术价值观理论解析[J];东北大学学报(社会科学版);2007年04期
2 梁丽;包国光;;试析技术异化的劳动异化根源[J];东北大学学报(社会科学版);2008年01期
3 刘永谋;;机器与统治——马克思科学技术论的权力之维[J];科学技术哲学研究;2012年01期
4 李桂花;蔡军迎;;哈贝马斯“第一位的生产力”与邓小平“第一生产力”之比较[J];理论学刊;2013年04期
5 艾四林;哈贝马斯交往理论评析[J];清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1995年03期
6 李桂花;张媛媛;;超越单向度的人——论马尔库塞的科技异化批判理论[J];社会科学战线;2012年07期
7 陈智;;哈贝马斯科学技术意识形态论探析[J];自然辩证法研究;2006年11期
8 朱凤青;;论芬伯格的技术民主化思想[J];自然辩证法研究;2010年06期
9 邓晓芒;;劳动异化及其根源[J];中国社会科学;1983年03期
10 J.哈贝马斯;李黎;;生产力与交往——答 H.-P.克鲁格[J];哲学译丛;1992年06期
本文编号:1387843
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/makesizhuyiyanjiu/1387843.html