马克思的“世界历史”和“世界历史民族”思想及其中国边疆研究意义——从“生产方式”的三种含义说起

发布时间：2018-01-24 13:49

本文关键词： 生产力生产方式世界历史世界历史民族中国边疆　出处：《文史哲》2015年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：黑格尔意义上的"世界历史民族"的发展有主辅两条线,而马克思《政治经济学批判·序言》展现的生产方式序列,是个人生产力发展作为"历史动因"在温带亚欧大陆这一时空维度上的"世界历史民族"主线。"世界历史民族"的型塑应该包括两种意义上的社会存在,一个是经济基础,另一个是社会基础,而不能局限于等同于前者的社会物质生产力。马克思通过"亚细亚的生产方式"这一文明史起点的创设,超越了黑格尔把波斯作为"世界历史起点"而把印度、蒙古乃至中国排除"世界历史的局外"这样的"地中海中心论"预设,并且把西方"陪伴着历史"的时段延伸到"东方从属于西方"的资本主义大工业的现代时期,进而揭示了"边界"地带对于大国史、全球史的世界历史意义。"游牧的生产方式"对"亚细亚的生产方式"构成黑格尔意义上的世界历史的"陪伴"关系,它把马克思的"红金主辅线历史观"形象地描画、铺展在中华大地上,其与西欧道路所呈现的世界历史民族主线序列有所不同,但并不自外于唯物史观的基本原理和马克思的生产方式序列。
[Abstract]:In the sense of Hegel, the development of "world historical nation" has two main and auxiliary lines, while Marx's critique of political economy 路preface shows the production mode sequence. It is the main line of "world historical nation" in the space-time dimension of temperate Eurasian continent that the development of individual productive forces is the "historical motive". The molding of "world historical nation" should include two kinds of social existence in the sense. One is the economic base, the other is the social basis, and can not be limited to the social material productivity equivalent to the former. Marx created the starting point of civilization history of "the production of Asia". It transcends the presupposition that Hegel regards Persia as the "starting point of world history" and excludes India, Mongolia and even China from the "Mediterranean center" of "world history". And the period of "accompanying the history" of the West is extended to the modern period of the big capitalist industry which "the East is subordinate to the West", thus revealing the "border" zone for the history of the great powers. The world historical significance of global history. "nomadic mode of production" constitutes the "accompanying" relationship of world history in the sense of Hegel to "the production mode of Asia". It depicts Marx's "historical view of the main and auxiliary lines of the Red Gold" and spreads on the land of China, which is different from the national main line of world history presented by the road of Western Europe. But not from the basic principles of historical materialism and Marx's production mode sequence.
【作者单位】：首都师范大学历史学院;中国社会科学院中国边疆研究所编辑部;
【基金】：中国社会科学院中国边疆史地研究中心课题“唯物史观与中国边疆理论研究”的阶段性成果
【分类号】：A811
【正文快照】： 一、问题的提出:何为“生产方式”李大钊的“马克思主义观”是阶级斗争“金线论”。他指出:唯物史观、资本主义政治经济学(剩余价值学说)以及科学社会主义“这三部理论,都有不可分割的关系,而阶级竞争学说恰如一条金线,把这三大原理从根本上联络起来”1。与此不同,恩格斯认为

【相似文献】