超越正义的正义论:反思“马克思与正义”关系之争

发布时间：2018-01-28 09:49

  本文关键词： 马克思 正义 历史唯物主义 人类解放　出处：《江海学刊》2011年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在西方学术界,马克思与正义理论之间关系的争论持续了半个多世纪。争论主要涉及两个核心问题:(1)马克思是否谴责资本主义为非正义,换言之,马克思的资本主义剥削批判理论是否依赖正义概念?(2)马克思的革命和解放是建立在历史必然性基础上,还是建立在正义的要求和原则基础上,按劳分配和按需分配原则可以理解为分配正义原则吗?在这两个问题上,西方马克思主义者当中存在着肯定论和否定论两种立场。这里首先考察它们之间争论的核心分歧;其次,在考察当代平等主义正义论基础上,笔者把马克思的立场概括为"超越正义的正义论"。
[Abstract]:In western academic circles, the relationship between Marx and the theory of justice has been debated for more than half a century. The argument mainly involves two core questions: 1) whether Marx condemns capitalism as injustice, in other words. Does Marx's critique Theory of capitalist Exploitation depend on the concept of Justice? 2) is Marx's revolution and liberation based on historical inevitability or on the requirements and principles of justice? can the principle of distribution according to work and distribution according to need be understood as the principle of distributive justice? On these two issues, there are two positions of positivism and negation among the western Marxists. Secondly, on the basis of investigating the contemporary egalitarian justice theory, the author generalizes Marx's position as "justice theory beyond justice".
【作者单位】： 复旦大学当代国外马克思主义研究中心;复旦大学哲学学院;
【分类号】：D08;A811.6
【正文快照】： 是,塔克-伍德命题并不被广泛认可。霍萨米在1979年的《哲学与公共事务》上发表一篇题为“马克思论分配正义”的文章对伍德的观点做了直接的批评,而伍德又在“马克思论权利和正义:对霍萨米的回应”文章中做了回应,从此以后这个问题浮出水面,成为理解和解释马克思思想的一个核，

本文编号：1470430