以哲学的方式推进《资本论》哲学研究——兼及“柯尔施问题”的“活动论”解

发布时间：2018-05-01 19:17

本文选题：哲学的方式 + 《资本论》　；参考：《天津社会科学》2015年05期

【摘要】：国内哲学界关于《资本论》哲学性的确证方式大体上有两种:"应用论"的确证方式和"视域论"的确证方式。将《资本论》"哲学思想"研究等同于"哲学知识"研究至今仍然是难以拨去的思想迷雾。马克思在《资本论》中的全部理论活动(包括哲学活动和科学活动)从结构上看存在活动方式与活动结果(各种具体的思想观念)之分。《资本论》中的科学(实证)活动不是自足的,其得以展开的前提——基本范畴和原则是由哲学(思辨)活动提供的;同样,哲学(思辨)活动也不是自足的,反思思想最终是为了构成更合理的(关于世界的)思想。也就是说,在马克思那里,并不存在哲学活动与科学活动谁取代谁的问题,但却存在哲学活动的结果能否真正成为科学活动的条件的问题。当下相关研究应在超越"哲学的知识论立场"的基础上,以哲学的提问方式、表征方式和思想方式进一步推进《资本论》哲学研究。
[Abstract]:In general, there are two ways of confirming the philosophical nature of Capital in domestic philosophical circles: the way of confirmation of "Theory of Application" and the way of corroboration of "Theory of Vision". To equate the study of philosophical thought with the study of philosophical knowledge is still an indelible fog of thought. All Marx's theoretical activities in Capital (including philosophical and scientific activities) are structurally divided into the ways of existing activities and the results of their activities (various concrete ideas). The activity is not self-sufficient, The premise of its development-the basic categories and principles are provided by philosophical (speculative) activities; likewise, philosophical (speculative) activities are not self-sufficient, and reflective thought is ultimately designed to form a more rational (about the world) thought. That is to say, in Marx, there is no question of who replaces the philosophical activity and the scientific activity, but there is the question whether the result of the philosophical activity can really become the condition of the scientific activity. On the basis of transcending the position of "philosophical knowledge theory", the relevant research should further advance the philosophical study of Capital by the way of philosophical questioning, representation and thought.
【作者单位】：黑龙江省社会科学院《学习与探索》杂志社;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大项目“《资本论》哲学思想的当代阐释”(项目号:12&ZD107)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：A811

【参考文献】