恩格斯对马克思主义哲学的贡献研究
发布时间:2018-05-05 03:26
本文选题:马克思 + 恩格斯 ; 参考:《河北大学》2012年硕士论文
【摘要】:长期以来,马克思与恩格斯的合作关系以及他们的思想上的一致性,通过普列汉诺夫、列宁等人的梳理之后,,几乎成为学界人所共知,是不言自明的定论。 按照正统的马克思主义哲学的解释传统,人们把马克思和恩格斯的哲学思想看成是不可分割的整体。不仅他们之间的个人友谊可以称作是世界上最伟大的,而且两人的思想也完全同一,不存在任何差别。西方马克思主义和马克思学的研究(如科拉柯夫斯基和诺曼·莱文等人)却已经注意到了差别的方面。他们试图揭示马克思和恩格斯之间在思想上的不同之处。由于阶级的或意识形态的偏见,这些研究者得出的结论无疑带有歪曲的成分,但这些研究对于马克思主义哲学的“再认识”也确实存在着一些可借鉴的地方。国内哲学界近些年来也开始着手这项工作。应该承认,这对于恢复马克思和恩格斯各自思想的本来面目,无疑具有积极的意义。把两个极具个性的历史伟人的思想完全看成是一回事,是不切实际的,它无异于一个天方夜谭。如果不能正视马克思同恩格斯在思想上尤其在哲学思想上的差别,就很有可能将两者混淆,这样就难免既误解马克思又误解恩格斯。这对于正确把握和领会他们各自的思想是一种妨碍,对马克思和恩格斯的研究也是有害的。 作为马克思主义哲学的两个代表人物,他们必然存在着统一,也确实存在差别。二者存在部分的差异是合乎情理的。鉴于这种判断,无论是一致说还是对立说都是在走极端,并不是谨慎和公正的研究结论。所以我们首先要区分出马克思的哲学思想和恩格斯的哲学思想,从而找到他们的交集和差别。这样才能做到谨慎对待马克思的巨大成就,同时重视恩格斯对建设和发展乃至推广马克思主义理论体系所作的巨大贡献。
[Abstract]:For a long time, the cooperative relationship between Marx and Engels and the consistency of their thoughts, after combing by Plainov, Lenin and others, almost became a self-evident conclusion. According to the interpretation tradition of orthodox Marxist philosophy, the philosophical thought of Marx and Engels is regarded as an indivisible whole. Not only can their personal friendship be described as the greatest in the world, but their minds are identical and there is no difference. Western Marxist and Marxist studies, such as Kolakowski and Norman Levin, have noticed the difference. They tried to reveal the ideological differences between Marx and Engels. Because of the prejudice of class or ideology, the conclusions drawn by these researchers are undoubtedly distorted, but these studies do have some references for the "re-cognition" of Marxist philosophy. In recent years, the domestic philosophy circles have also begun to do this work. It should be acknowledged that this is undoubtedly of positive significance to the restoration of Marx and Engels' ideas as they are. It is impractical to think of the thoughts of two great men of history as a matter of fact, which is tantamount to a fantasy. If we can not face up to the difference between Marx and Engels in thought, especially in philosophy, it is very possible to confuse the two, so it is inevitable to misunderstand Marx and Engels. This is a hindrance to correctly grasping and understanding their respective thoughts and harmful to the study of Marx and Engels. As two representative figures of Marxist philosophy, they must be unified and indeed different. Part of the difference between the two is reasonable. In view of this judgment, both consensus and opposition are at extremes and are not prudent and fair conclusions. So we must first distinguish Marx's philosophy thought and Engels' philosophy thought, and then find their intersection and difference. Only in this way can we treat Marx's great achievements with caution and attach importance to Engels' great contribution to the construction, development and even promotion of Marxist theoretical system.
【学位授予单位】:河北大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:A811
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 梅荣政;阳黔花;;历史唯物主义发展的丰碑(一)——《家庭、私有制和国家的起源》研读[J];思想理论教育导刊;2010年04期
2 毛晓碚;;恩格斯的贡献[J];改革与战略;2005年11期
3 秦为忠;从《神圣家族》看马克思主义的发展[J];湖北大学成人教育学院学报;2002年06期
4 任力;恩格斯晚年对马克思主义唯物史观的坚持与发展[J];理论与改革;2004年04期
5 余京华;吴家华;;恩格斯晚年历史唯物主义书信的科学性与价值性探微[J];理论建设;2008年05期
6 侯衍社;;马克思恩格斯的资本主义观与恩格斯的晚年创新[J];理论视野;2009年02期
7 段迎晖;;恩格斯对创立历史唯物主义的独特贡献——兼评广松涉“恩格斯主导说”[J];兰州学刊;2008年08期
8 诺曼·莱文;赵玉兰;;马克思与黑格尔思想的连续性[J];马克思主义与现实;2008年05期
9 何丽野;;从文本考证看恩格斯在《德意志意识形态》第一章批判费尔巴哈思想中的贡献[J];南京社会科学;2007年04期
10 朱传h
本文编号:1845987
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/makesizhuyiyanjiu/1845987.html