对《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》写作时间的再探讨——根据马克思原始手稿和MEGA2的重新考证

发布时间：2018-07-09 13:35

本文选题：费尔巴哈 + 马克思主义　；参考：《甘肃社会科学》2017年06期

【摘要】：《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》的写作时间问题,不仅是单纯的文献学的问题,而且是思想史的重大问题。关于它的写作时间,恩格斯的"1845年春"这个标注是对43年前往事的描述,而没有留下更多的直接证据,因而也给后世的争论埋下了伏笔。著名的巴加图利亚和陶伯特关于写作时间的争论,是基于各自对思想史的理解,而非文献学的直接证明,所以最终没有结果。事实上,《提纲》内在的、固有的文献联系证明,第3条的写作时间不早于1845年夏马克思访问曼彻斯特,第6条的写作时间不早于1845年8月,因此《提纲》主体部分的写作时间应不早于1845年8月。从马克思主义思想史定位的层面看,《提纲》显示出与《德意志意识形态》之间更紧密的联系。
[Abstract]:The writing time of Feuerbach is not only a question of philology, but also a major problem in the history of thought. As to its writing time, Engels'"Spring of 1845" label is a description of the past 43 years ago, leaving no further direct evidence, and thus laid the groundwork for future generations of controversy. The famous debates between Bagaturea and Taubert about writing time are based on their own understanding of the history of thought, not on the direct proof of philology, so they have no result in the end. In fact, the inherent and inherent literature links in the outline prove that Article 3 was written no earlier than Marx's visit to Manchester in the summer of 1845, and Article 6 was written no earlier than August 1845. Therefore, the main part of the outline should be written no earlier than August 1845. From the perspective of Marxist ideology history, the outline shows a closer relationship with German ideology.
【作者单位】：北京大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：中国国家留学基金“国家建设高水平大学公派研究生项目”(项目批准号:留金发[2016]3100号)的研究成果
【分类号】：A811

【相似文献】