深化中国《资本论》研究的方法论自觉——国际学界对《资本论》的政治式阅读及其评价
发布时间：2018-11-17 19:13
【摘要】：强调中国的《资本论》研究的方法论自觉,其重要一维是对国际学界的《资本论》研究进行分析和研判。在当代国外左派学界,奈格里、克里弗等学者始终致力于从政治角度来解读《资本论》的内涵,并视之为在当下语境中重读《资本论》的必要前提。尽管他们的观点不尽相同,但都会选择货币、商品等某种要素来凸显对抗性社会关系及阶级斗争的内涵。由于他们未能把握住马克思阶级斗争理论的唯物史观基础,因此,他们往往会因为过于强调单纯的政治式解读线索而忽略了《资本论》中关于生产方式内在矛盾运动规律的重要性。比岱的解读思路尽管在对《资本论》的政治式解读中显得具有较强的学理性,但过度强调政治斗争线索的重要性也使他看不到马克思历史辩证法思想的深层内涵。
[Abstract]:It emphasizes the methodological consciousness of the study of Capital in China, and its important one dimension is to analyze and judge the study of Capital in international academic circles. In the contemporary foreign left-wing academic circles, Negri, Clive and other scholars have always devoted themselves to interpreting the connotation of Capital from a political perspective, and regarded it as a necessary prerequisite for rereading Capital in the present context. Although their views are different, they all choose some elements, such as currency and commodities, to highlight the connotation of antagonistic social relations and class struggle. Because they failed to grasp the historical materialism foundation of Marx's theory of class struggle, They tend to neglect the importance of the law of internal contradiction in production mode in Capital because of their too much emphasis on the simple political interpretation of clues. Although Beidai's thinking of reading Capital in a political way has a strong sense of learning, but too much emphasis on the importance of political struggle leads him not to see the deep connotation of Marx's dialectical thought of history.
【作者单位】： 南京大学哲学系;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“基于文本阐释的马克思主义哲学通史研究”(16JJD710007)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：A123;F0-0
，
本文编号：2338790
[Abstract]:It emphasizes the methodological consciousness of the study of Capital in China, and its important one dimension is to analyze and judge the study of Capital in international academic circles. In the contemporary foreign left-wing academic circles, Negri, Clive and other scholars have always devoted themselves to interpreting the connotation of Capital from a political perspective, and regarded it as a necessary prerequisite for rereading Capital in the present context. Although their views are different, they all choose some elements, such as currency and commodities, to highlight the connotation of antagonistic social relations and class struggle. Because they failed to grasp the historical materialism foundation of Marx's theory of class struggle, They tend to neglect the importance of the law of internal contradiction in production mode in Capital because of their too much emphasis on the simple political interpretation of clues. Although Beidai's thinking of reading Capital in a political way has a strong sense of learning, but too much emphasis on the importance of political struggle leads him not to see the deep connotation of Marx's dialectical thought of history.
【作者单位】： 南京大学哲学系;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“基于文本阐释的马克思主义哲学通史研究”(16JJD710007)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：A123;F0-0
，
本文编号：2338790
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/makesizhuyiyanjiu/2338790.html
