古代洛阳都城空间演变研究

发布时间：2018-04-26 18:12

本文选题：古代 + 洛阳都城　；参考：《陕西师范大学》2005年博士论文

【摘要】：本文以古代洛阳都城空间为核心,从“国家—空间—社会”的视角,对夏宋间的洛阳都城空间形成演变状况及其机制进行了论述。内容上没有采取面面俱到的方式,而是以历代王朝建立后所要解决的都城空间建设的四大基本共同问题(都城选址、政治中枢的建立、都城社会系统的控制、都城经济生活中心的建构)和中国古代都城空间模式三大结构单元(宫城、里坊、市场)为核心。在此基础上,对古代洛阳都城空间与中国古代都城空间模式之关系进行了讨论。首先考察了古代洛阳的都城建置。在前辈学者古都定义的基础上,借鉴现代政治学相关研究成果,提出了衡量古都的具体标准以及西周实行多都多都并存并重制、偃师商城和唐东都洛阳都级动态变化等观点,在此基础上,重新考定了洛阳在古代的具体建都朝代与年代,得出了新的结论。在确定了本文讨论中心“洛阳都城空间”的时间界域和特征后,对古代建都洛阳的原因,进行了相当全面的论述。对以往认识较为粗略的周公“天下之中”说的考察,明确提出了周公“天下之中”说是中国古代第一个较系统的建都理论,其内容包括地理、政治、经济和文化等4个方面的内容,它不仅构成了历朝建都洛阳的独特理路的基础和神圣性、合理性的依据,而且还发展引伸出“择中立宫”和“择宫之中轴线立朝”观念和制度,对后世王朝选址建都及都城空间结构形态规划布局产生了重大影响。有关宫城的讨论,是本文着墨较多的部分,分两个方面展开。一是讨论宫城的历史过程及阶段特征,以说明古代都城的核心空间是怎样形成,又是在何种背景下进行重构的。二是讨论宫城的形成与阶段性变动对古代都城空间形态结构的影响。通过讨论,提出我国古代都城的最早形态是“非城郭形态”宫城,这也是我国古代城市的最早形态;“非城郭形态”和“城郭形态”是宫城的基本形态;宫城制度经历了多宫城制、双宫城制和单一宫城制3个发展阶段,其演变体现了古代都城核心空间建构与重构的基本过程,也反映了不同的政治变化;宫城既是都城空间发展的起点和原型空间,也是其它空间定位展开的原点和定位维度。对里坊和市场的讨论,主要围绕发展形态和形态——功能展开,内中既有对里坊和市场微观结构的考证复原,也有对其发展形态的中观分析和把握。通过讨论,认为古代洛阳都城经历了三个发展阶段,西周洛邑里制形成、北魏洛阳城里坊制和隋唐洛阳城坊里制是其中的3个关节点;隋唐洛阳城里坊并非如传统认识
[Abstract]:Taking the ancient Luoyang capital space as the core, from the angle of "nation, space and society", this paper discusses the formation and evolution of Luoyang capital space during Xia and Song dynasties and its mechanism. Instead of taking an all-inclusive approach, the contents are based on the four basic common problems in the construction of capital space to be solved after the establishment of the dynasties (the location of the capital, the establishment of the political center, the control of the social system of the capital. The construction of the economic life center of the capital and the three structural units (Miyagi, Lifang, market) of the ancient Chinese capital are the core. On this basis, the relationship between the ancient Luoyang capital space and the ancient Chinese capital space model is discussed. First of all, the ancient city of Luoyang was investigated. On the basis of the definition of the ancient capital by the predecessors, and referring to the relevant research results of modern political science, this paper puts forward the specific standards to measure the ancient capital and the view that the western Zhou Dynasty has implemented the system of co-existence of both more and more capital, and the dynamic changes of the capital of Yanshi and Luoyang, the capital of Tang Dongdu, and so on. On this basis, the author re-determined Luoyang's specific capital in ancient dynasties and ages, and drew a new conclusion. After determining the time boundary and characteristics of Luoyang Capital Space, this paper discusses the causes of the ancient capital Luoyang. An investigation of Zhou Gong's theory of "the world in the world", which has a rough understanding in the past, makes it clear that Zhou Gong's theory of "the middle of the world" is the first systematic theory of capital construction in ancient China, and its contents include geography and politics. The four aspects of economy and culture not only formed the basis of the unique rationalism, sanctity and rationality of Luoyang, but also developed the concept and system of "choosing the neutral palace" and "choosing the central axis of the palace". It has a great influence on the layout of the capital and the spatial structure of the capital. The discussion about Miyagi is the part of this paper, which is divided into two aspects. The first is to discuss the historical process and stage characteristics of Miyagi in order to explain how the core space of the ancient capital was formed and under what background it was reconstructed. The second is to discuss the influence of the formation of Miyagi and the change of stages on the spatial structure of the ancient capital. Through discussion, it is pointed out that the earliest form of ancient capital in China is "non-urban Guo", which is also the earliest form of ancient Chinese cities, "non-urban Guo" and "urban Guo" are the basic forms of Miyagi. The Miyagi system has experienced three stages of development: multi-Miyagi system, double Miyagi system and single Miyagi system. Its evolution reflects the basic process of the construction and reconstruction of the core space of the ancient capital, as well as the different political changes. Miyagi is not only the starting point and prototype space of the development of capital space, but also the origin and orientation dimension of other spatial positioning. The discussion of Li Fang and the market mainly revolves around the development form and the form-function, in which the textual research and restoration of the microcosmic structure of the Li Fang and the market, as well as the meso analysis and grasp of the development pattern, are made. Through discussion, it is concluded that the ancient Luoyang capital experienced three stages of development, the Luoyang City Square system in the Northern Wei Dynasty and the Luoyang City Square system in the Sui and Tang dynasties were three of them, and the Luoyang City Square in the Sui and Tang dynasties was not the traditional understanding.
【学位授予单位】：陕西师范大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2005
【分类号】：K928.6

【引证文献】