财政支农支出对农村居民消费总量及结构的影响研究
[Abstract]:Investment, consumption and export are the "three carriages" to stimulate economic growth, but the economic growth of our country depends on the role of investment and export, and the pulling utility of export is limited. The pulling utility of investment needs to be supported by consumption, and the pulling effect of consumption on economic growth is also insufficient. The shortage of rural residents' consumption demand has become the main factor that restricts the economic growth of our country. This determines that the fundamental driving force to stimulate the economic growth of our country is to improve the consumption level of rural residents. China is a big agricultural country. The important means of macro regulation and control to agriculture are fiscal policy, which can stimulate residents' consumption and optimize the consumption knot of residents. It is of great significance to build up the policy of financial support for agriculture, to maximize the role of financial funds, as a lever to pry the consumption demand of rural residents, not only to improve the consumption level of farmers but also to improve the income level of farmers, the quality of Gai Shannong's people's life and the solution of the "three rural" problems. In order to fully release the consumption potential of farmers, we can truly expand domestic demand in order to fundamentally improve the quality of life of rural residents. Based on the panel data of the year 2003-2014, this paper studies the effect of financial support to rural residents' consumption and structure by the empirical method of econometrics. The theory of the influence of expenditure on the consumption of rural residents is analyzed, in which the relationship between fiscal expenditure and resident consumption is theoretically analyzed with Keynes theory, and the influence mechanism of fiscal expenditure on Residents' consumption is analyzed. Then, based on 1978-2014 years' time series data, the total expenditure of financial support for agriculture and the total consumption of rural residents are respectively. The current situation of the quantity and structure is analyzed. In the process of empirical analysis, the relationship between the expenditure of financial supporting agriculture and the total consumption and structure of rural residents is studied by building a panel measurement model. The conclusions are as follows: (1) the expenditure of financial support to rural residents has a significant promotion effect on the total consumption of rural residents. The expenditure of government and support agriculture has a significant effect on the total consumption of rural residents, which shows that the expenditure of financial supporting agriculture can improve the consumption of rural residents and improve the living standard of farmers. (2) the expenditure of financial support to rural residents has a certain regulating effect on the consumption structure of rural residents. The results show that the government provides a confidence and material basis for the consumption of the residents by increasing the investment in rural social security and public infrastructure, and causes the change of the consumption expectation of the farmers. The willingness of farmers to consume also increased, farmers began to pay attention to the quality of living standards, the expenditure on development and enjoyment of consumption gradually increased, the consumption structure of rural residents were optimized. (3) the income of rural residents is an important factor affecting the consumption of rural residents. The empirical results show that the income of rural residents to rural residents consumption. The total amount has significant squeezing effect. Similarly, the rural residents' income has a significant effect on the rural residents' development enjoyment consumption and survival consumption, and the impact on the rural residents' development enjoyment consumption is greater than the impact on the basic survival type consumption. On the basis of theoretical analysis and empirical test, it is combined with our country. In the actual situation, the relevant policy suggestions are put forward: one is to increase the financial support for agriculture, to ensure the total amount of the expenditure of the agriculture; two, to broaden the income increase channel and improve the income of the farmers; three, to strengthen the construction of the infrastructure and improve the rural consumption environment; four, to improve the rural social security system and to stabilize the consumption expectations of the farmers.
【学位授予单位】:浙江财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F323.8
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 何振国;;我国财政支农支出总量不足及成因分析[J];财政研究;2006年10期
2 何振国;王强;;财政支农支出优先次序研究[J];管理世界;2006年10期
3 赵石磊;;财政支农支出与农民纯收入关系研究[J];兰州商学院学报;2007年02期
4 李放;朱靖娟;;试论我国财政支农支出口径的调整[J];南京农业大学学报(社会科学版);2007年03期
5 孙红霞;;财政支农支出总量与最优支出规模的实证分析[J];农村财政与财务;2008年05期
6 王力;丁鹏;;江西省财政支农支出对农民收入增长的影响研究[J];农业经济;2008年07期
7 肖亚毅;何雄伟;;财政支农支出与农民收入增长的实证研究[J];中国集体经济;2008年19期
8 张惠茹;;福建省财政支农支出:总量、结构及其绩效分析[J];三明学院学报;2009年03期
9 孔菲;;我国财政支农支出的现状研究[J];中外企业家;2009年20期
10 齐福全;;北京市财政支农支出绩效分析[J];地方财政研究;2010年12期
相关会议论文 前4条
1 谷芳芳;罗建朝;;我国财政支农支出对农民收入影响的实证研究[A];社会科学界第二届陕西省2008学术年会暨西北农林科技大学经济管理学院研究生论坛——“新农村建设与城乡统筹发展”专题论文集[C];2008年
2 邢艳霞;王中博;;财政支农支出对农业经济增长的贡献:基于东北地区的面板数据分析[A];中华外国经济学说研究会第19次年会暨外国经济学说与国内外经济发展新格局(会议文集)[C];2011年
3 朱洁;朱美玲;;新疆财政支农支出绩效评价指标体系研究[A];中国“三农”问题研究与探索:全国财政支农优秀论文选(2008)[C];2009年
4 李新涛;;财政支农支出行为与财政政策问题研究[A];中国“三农”问题研究获奖优秀论文选编(2004)[C];2004年
相关重要报纸文章 前9条
1 记者 苏同敏;我省去年财政支农支出310多亿元[N];陕西日报;2011年
2 通讯员 李才有;2012年我州财政支农支出逾12亿元[N];红河日报;2013年
3 黎银霞;我区五项措施加快财政支农支出进度[N];广西日报;2007年
4 记者 邱爽;一季度我市财政支农支出两亿多元[N];平顶山日报;2011年
5 中国农业大学校长 柯炳生;财政支农资金比重下降现象不容忽视[N];农民日报;2008年
6 张胜 苏昌平 黎军;江西:洒向沃野都是情[N];中国财经报;2004年
7 孟歌 王永群;转移支付应给地方更多统筹空间[N];中国经济时报;2007年
8 肖建生 易博文 通讯员 徐林;全省GDP7493亿增长12.1%[N];湖南日报;2007年
9 ;围绕“走在全省前列、率先实现崛起”战略目标 着力建设实力、高效、文化、和谐、魅力平顶山[N];平顶山日报;2007年
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 郭忠孝;财政支农支出的经济效率研究[D];沈阳农业大学;2008年
2 韩林;我国财政支农支出问题研究[D];南开大学;2010年
3 黄小舟;财政支农支出绩效研究[D];华中农业大学;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 林斯勇;中国财政支农支出结构优化研究[D];厦门大学;2008年
2 姜言山;山东省财政支农支出规模效率研究[D];西北农林科技大学;2012年
3 张一舟;财政支农支出对农村居民消费影响研究[D];宁夏大学;2015年
4 方凯;江苏省财政支农绩效的实证研究[D];苏州大学;2015年
5 贾敬峰;我国财政支农支出对农村居民消费的影响研究[D];山东大学;2015年
6 潘柳全;我国财政支农支出效应的区域差异分析[D];南京师范大学;2015年
7 甘珍妮;福建省财政支农支出绩效评价研究[D];福建农林大学;2015年
8 周海洋;我国财政支农支出的效率研究[D];沈阳师范大学;2016年
9 杨娟;财政支农支出对农村居民消费总量及结构的影响研究[D];浙江财经大学;2017年
10 林亚括;我国财政支农支出的效果分析及政策建议[D];厦门大学;2009年
,本文编号:2142727
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/shehuibaozhanglunwen/2142727.html