基于民生保障的吸引渔民入籍三沙对策研究
[Abstract]:Since ancient times, China has carried out fishing and maritime trade activities in the South China Sea, and has indisputable sovereignty over the South China Sea. However, for a long time, Vietnam, Malaysia, the Philippines and other neighboring countries have constantly contested and occupied the South China Sea, seriously violating China's territorial sovereignty. Since the establishment of Sansha City in July 2012, the Sansha Municipal Government has been carrying out administrative work rapidly. In 2013, the Sansha Residents settled down to work, but the fishermen are reluctant to give up the land ownership and distribution rights of their original place of origin. The benefits of land requisition, transportation, education, medical treatment, hydropower, oil and gas supply, communications and other livelihood security facilities in Sansha City are still weak, the social security system has not yet been established, and the employment channels in Sansha are single and so on, resulting in little effect on the settlement of residents. On the basis of visiting the fishermen on Sansha islands and reefs and consulting a large amount of data, this paper makes a comprehensive analysis of the fishermen's refusal to immigrate to Sansha and puts forward corresponding countermeasures and suggestions, which is of great theoretical and practical value.
The introduction mainly introduces the main background of setting up Sansha as a city, the content and significance of the topic, the related concepts and theoretical basis, and the key and difficult points and solutions to carry out the research work of the paper. The second part expounds the construction of Sansha citizens'living infrastructure. The third part analyzes the reasons why fishermen refuse to move to Sansha city, and points out that the construction of people's livelihood security facilities such as income reduction, transportation, medical treatment, education and communication is imperfect, the social security system is not established, and the employment channel is single, which leads to the reluctance of fishermen to move. The fourth part compares and analyzes the similarities and differences between Sansha City and Maldives, elaborates Maldives'experiences and practices in developing tourism, leisure fishery, improving people's livelihood security facilities and strengthening environmental protection, and brings enlightenment to Sansha City in developing tourism, improving people's livelihood security facilities and environmental protection. On this basis, the fifth part combines the successful experience of Maldives and China's national conditions and the geographical location of Sansha City to put forward the countermeasures and suggestions to improve Sansha's livelihood security, so as to promote the migration of fishermen to Sansha's household registration; the conclusion draws conclusions from the overall analysis of the article.
In general, the article recognizes the contradiction between the government's strengthening of administration and the residents'willingness to naturalize. In order to resolve these contradictions, Sansha City should formulate policies and take measures to solve the problem of unsound livelihood security, eliminate fishermen's worries, and finally voluntarily enter Sansha. There are also some new ideas and characteristics as follows. (1) The topic is relatively novel. This paper analyzes and expounds the problems of Sansha's public life security facilities construction. Before this, no one has studied this content. Tracking the existing policies and systems to ensure that research keeps pace with the times. (2) The application of interdisciplinary research methods. The situation is analyzed systematically by the way of current situation analysis, investigation and comparative study, combined with my knowledge reserve and work experience, and put forward my own views, so that the conclusions of the study are scientific and feasible.
【学位授予单位】:海南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D67;D631.42
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 姚作汀 ,沈素芹;城乡统筹必须撤除户籍樊篱[J];今日浙江;2003年11期
2 姚秀兰;;论台湾地区户籍法律制度及其借鉴[J];法律文化研究;2006年00期
3 立;;云南:2008年将终结“二元制”户籍登记管理模式[J];南方农村;2007年06期
4 于建嵘;;演变围绕两条主线:户籍制度与资源配置[J];人民论坛;2008年01期
5 孟大川;张为波;;关于建立城乡统一户籍制度的思考[J];西南民族大学学报(人文社科版);2008年12期
6 刘颖;;户籍制度与身份建构——从户籍制度变迁透视对农民身份的建构[J];才智;2008年23期
7 赵娜;;从户籍制度看城乡差距[J];中共云南省委党校学报;2008年01期
8 ;云南昆明取消“农业人口”户籍登记模式[J];福建农业;2008年03期
9 许章润;;在户籍与狱制之间[J];读书;2008年06期
10 潘丽萍;;城市化的户籍制度障碍及创新综述[J];理论导刊;2008年09期
相关会议论文 前6条
1 姚秀兰;;论我国台湾地区户籍制度及其借鉴[A];全国外国法制史研究会学术丛书——20世纪西方宪政的发展及其变革[C];2004年
2 张玉林;;集体化时代的农民流动与户籍制度[A];中国农业历史学会第九次学术研讨会论文集[C];2002年
3 沈越;马瑞辉;;户籍制度对农业剩余劳动力转移影响的经济学分析——基于托达罗模型的修正[A];全国高校社会主义经济理论与实践研讨会第20次会议论文集(第三册)[C];2006年
4 张立;;户籍制度与中国城镇化:1949—2009——户籍改革方向刍议[A];转型与重构——2011中国城市规划年会论文集[C];2011年
5 萧衡锺;;社会转型期下户籍体制改革的政策取向[A];中国第五次人的发展经济学研讨会论文集[C];2013年
6 冯晓英;;城乡结合部问题的成因与治理思路[A];和谐社会:社会建设与改革创新——2007学术前沿论丛(上卷)[C];2007年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 记者 魏巍;我省施行户籍窗口首接责任制[N];山西法制报;2014年
2 案例编写人 河南省荥阳市人民法院 禹爽 王林;公民有权以祖辈姓进行出生户籍登记[N];人民法院报;2014年
3 通讯员 禹爽 王林;婴儿不随父母姓,,派出所拒办户籍登记[N];浙江法制报;2014年
4 盛大林 郑州 市民;为户籍“减负”有助于推动改革[N];华夏时报;2007年
5 李芳邋吕宁丰 王长喜 吕永明;200万张民国户籍卡重见天日[N];南京日报;2008年
6 本报记者 李凯;民众期盼“户籍开放”再开放些[N];太原日报;2008年
7 国务院发展研究中心资源与环境政策研究所 李佐军;让户籍制度回归本质配套[N];中国经济时报;2013年
8 中国海洋大学 胡乐乐;户籍新政期待教育渐进改革[N];光明日报;2014年
9 周孟珂 中国人民大学社会与人口学院;城乡户籍一体化势在必行[N];中国妇女报;2014年
10 吴同品;常州新户籍制度具有4大特点[N];常州日报;2014年
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 王文录;人口城镇化背景下的户籍制度变迁研究[D];吉林大学;2010年
2 刘杰;跨体制下的身份诉求与结构化形塑[D];吉林大学;2012年
3 姚秀兰;户籍、身份与社会变迁[D];华东政法学院;2004年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 钟周蒙;瑞安公安局户籍管理系统设计与实现[D];电子科技大学;2014年
2 吕辉辉;温州市瓯海区户籍管理系统设计与实现[D];电子科技大学;2014年
3 雷雨尘;无户籍人员人权的法律保障[D];湖南师范大学;2015年
4 彭小川;基于ASP的户籍流动管理系统设计与实现[D];电子科技大学;2015年
5 周淑红;基于民生保障的吸引渔民入籍三沙对策研究[D];海南大学;2015年
6 王一琼;论户籍制度的改革[D];中国政法大学;2009年
7 钱英;中国二元制户籍制度的形成原因分析[D];河北大学;2011年
8 陈涓;户籍制度与资源配置研究[D];天津大学;2012年
9 游相录;秦户籍制度探究[D];西北大学;2008年
10 辛诚诚;“土地换户籍”政策分析[D];东北财经大学;2011年
本文编号:2220938
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/shehuibaozhanglunwen/2220938.html