当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 社会学论文 >

西咸一体化下两地城市居民主观生活质量研究

发布时间:2018-03-05 19:28

  本文选题:西咸城市居民 切入点:主观生活质量 出处:《西安工程大学》2011年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:人本性社会观要求“以人为本”,关注居民的生活质量,关注居民的生活需求,把提高全国人民的生活水平和生活质量作为发展经济的根本目的,作为全面建设小康社会的出发点与归宿点。西安与咸阳作为关中经济带最有活力增长极与西部大开发桥头堡,2002年底,两市政府率先提出西安、咸阳一体化。西咸一体化自实施以来,显著改善了当地居民的生活条件,取得了积极成效。然而两地城市居民在家庭、工作、生态、资源、就业等具体生活领域方面的主观生活质量如何,两市居民主观生活质量有无差别,该举措具体实施效果怎么样,这些问题都需要进一步探讨和研究。 首先,文章在参照美国、欧洲、澳大利亚、东南亚、中国等国内外学者提出的城市居民主观生活质量指标体系基础上,结合西安、咸阳两地实际情况,构建了西咸城市居民主观生活质量评价指标体系,,并运用因子分析法进行验正。 其次,根据构建的指标体系,运用描述性分析、交叉列联表、因子分析,对西咸两市居民主观生活质量现状做出分析与评价;运用独立样本T检验、方差分析的方法,分析了主观生活质量的影响因素在人口学变量上的差异;并运用相关分析、描述性分析、方差分析等多元统计方法,对两市居民主观生活质量做横向对比,分析了两市居民在主观生活质量现状、地区与主观生活质量影响因素等方面的差异,最终得出以下结论: (1)西咸居民整体生活主观满意度均数为3.16分,介于一般水平与较高水平之间,西咸两地城市居民主观生活质量处于中等略偏上水平。 (2)西咸两市居民主观生活质量在不同年龄层、不同文化程度和其他人口学变量上存在着差异。 (3)西安、咸阳两市居民总体主观生活质量水平相同,但在六个具体的生活领域和30个具体的生活因子的得分及排序上存在着差异。 (4)西咸地区不同,两市居民对主观生活质量影响因素的认知与排序存在着差异。 论文构建了西咸城市居民主观生活质量评价指标体系,对西咸居民主观生活质量现状及影响因素进行了实证分析,对西安与咸阳城市居民主观生活质量现状及影响因素进行了横向对比研究。论文既拓展了主观生活质量的研究对象与研究范畴,也为相关部门进一步提高西安与咸阳城市居民的主观生活质量提供了参考和借鉴。
[Abstract]:The view of human nature society requires "people-oriented", pays attention to the quality of life of the residents, pays attention to the needs of the residents, and regards the improvement of the living standards and the quality of life of the people of the whole country as the fundamental purpose of the development of the economy. As the starting point and destination of building a well-off society in an all-round way, Xi'an and Xianyang, as the most dynamic growth poles in the Guanzhong economic belt and the bridgehead for the development of the western region, were the first to propose Xi'an at the end of 2002. Xianyang integration. Since its implementation, Xixian integration has significantly improved the living conditions of local residents and achieved positive results. However, urban residents in the two places live in families, work, ecology and resources. The subjective quality of life in employment and other specific areas of life, whether there is any difference in the subjective quality of life between the residents of the two cities, and how the concrete implementation effect of this measure is, needs to be further explored and studied. First of all, on the basis of reference to the subjective quality of life index system of urban residents put forward by scholars at home and abroad, such as the United States, Europe, Australia, Southeast Asia and China, the article combines the actual situation of Xi'an and Xianyang. The subjective quality of life (QOL) evaluation index system of Xixian city residents was constructed, and the factor analysis method was used to verify the quality of life. Secondly, according to the index system, using descriptive analysis, cross-list table, factor analysis, to make an analysis and evaluation of the residents' subjective quality of life, using independent sample T-test, variance analysis method, This paper analyzes the difference in demographic variables of the influencing factors of subjective quality of life, and makes a horizontal comparison between the subjective quality of life of residents of the two cities by using multiple statistical methods, such as correlation analysis, descriptive analysis, variance analysis, etc. This paper analyzes the differences between the residents of the two cities in terms of the present situation of subjective quality of life, regional and subjective quality of life and other factors, and finally draws the following conclusions:. 1) the average of subjective satisfaction of whole life of Xixian residents is 3.16, which is between the general level and the higher level, and the subjective quality of life of the urban residents of the two places is slightly above the middle level. (2) the subjective quality of life of residents in Xishan city is different in different age groups, different education levels and other demographic variables. 3) the overall subjective quality of life of Xi'an and Xianyang is the same, but there are differences in the scores and ranking of six specific life fields and 30 specific life factors. 4) there are differences in cognition and ranking of subjective quality of life between the residents of the two cities. This paper constructs the evaluation index system of the subjective quality of life of Xixian city residents, and makes an empirical analysis of the present situation of the subjective quality of life of the residents of Xixian city and its influencing factors. The present situation and influencing factors of subjective quality of life of Xi'an and Xianyang urban residents are studied in this paper, which not only expands the research object and scope of subjective quality of life, but also makes a comparative study on the subjective quality of life of Xi'an and Xianyang. It also provides reference for relevant departments to further improve the subjective quality of life of Xi'an and Xianyang urban residents.
【学位授予单位】:西安工程大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:C912.81

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 方建敏;;用马斯洛的需要理论看以人为本的发展观[J];太原城市职业技术学院学报;2006年03期

2 陈义平;两种生活质量评估方法的比较分析[J];广东社会科学;1993年03期

3 金子勇;为了城市的“生活质量”[J];国外社会科学;1986年02期

4 K.苏斯耐 ,G.A.费舍 ,唐仲勋;“生活质量”的社会学研究[J];国外社会科学;1987年10期

5 周长城;东南亚国家的生活质量研究[J];国外社会科学;2002年06期

6 张小丽;;城市居民主观生活质量及影响因素[J];传承;2008年14期

7 李正龙;;居民生活质量满意度的实证研究[J];华东经济管理;2006年06期

8 彭念一,李丽;我国居民生活质量评价指标与综合评价研究[J];湖南大学学报(社会科学版);2003年05期

9 易松国,风笑天;城市居民主观生活质量研究——武汉、北京、西安三地调查资料的比较分析[J];华中理工大学学报(社会科学版);1997年03期

10 王威,陈云;欧洲生活质量指标体系及其评价[J];江苏社会科学;2002年01期

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 林木;[N];中国经济时报;2004年

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 余宏;上海城市居民生活质量研究[D];上海大学;2008年

相关硕士学位论文 前5条

1 韩东晓;城市居民生活质量评价与对策研究[D];浙江大学;2004年

2 董长云;城市居民休闲生活质量指标体系研究[D];浙江大学;2006年

3 张华;重庆市高校教师主观生活质量评价与管理对策研究[D];重庆大学;2006年

4 陈娟;城市居民生活质量研究[D];西南交通大学;2006年

5 王峰;河北省居民生活质量评价的实证研究[D];河北大学;2008年



本文编号:1571570

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/shgj/1571570.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户8cc7b***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com