从方法论的反思到研究典范的转移——再论台湾地区的社会科学“中国化”运动

发布时间：2018-04-26 16:18

本文选题：台湾 + 社会科学中国化　；参考：《学术月刊》2013年06期

【摘要】："核心"对"边陲"学术文化的长期影响与全面支配,不仅造成了台湾地区整个文化传统的严重"萎缩",而且也造成了台湾地区人文社会科学学术主体性和独立性的彻底"迷失"。社会科学"中国化"运动的兴起,正是在"核心一边陲"结构部分松动之后台湾人文社会科学界为重建学术主体性而做的一次重大努力,是反对西方特别是美国学术"殖民"、追求学术独立的一场重要抗争。至于这场运动由早先的方法论反思向稍后的研究典范转移之推展,一方面固然与20世纪70年代美国科学哲学领域的"典范革命"有关,但另一方面,也是更重要的方面,则与台湾社会由"一元"向"多元"的结构性变迁以及随社会结构变迁而来的社会价值观念由"一元"向"多元"的递嬗相辉映。
[Abstract]:The long-term influence and overall domination of "core" on "frontier" academic culture, It has not only caused the serious "atrophy" of the whole cultural tradition in Taiwan, but also caused the complete "loss" of the academic subjectivity and independence of the humanities and social sciences in Taiwan. The rise of the "Sinicization" movement in the social sciences was a major effort made by Taiwan's humanities and social science community to rebuild academic subjectivity after the partial loosening of the "core one frontier" structure. It is an important struggle against the West, especially the American academic colonization and the pursuit of academic independence. As for the development of the movement from the earlier methodological reflection to the later paradigm of research, on the one hand, it is certainly related to the "exemplary revolution" in the field of American philosophy of science in the 1970s, but on the other hand, it is also a more important aspect. It reflects the structural changes of Taiwan society from "monism" to "pluralism" and the evolution of social values from "monism" to "pluralism".
【作者单位】：华东师范大学历史学系;
【基金】：教育部哲学社会科学重点研究基地——华东师范大学思想文化研究中心重大研究项目“六十年来港台人文社会思潮研究”(11JJD770008)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：C12

【参考文献】