家庭社会经济地位、教养方式与孩子学业成绩
发布时间：2019-02-09 16:47
【摘要】：在现代社会中,教育作为代际流动的中介,学业成绩是看作孩子未来经济状况的重要指标,教育获得是影响社会流动的最重要的机制之一。更高的社会阶层的父母的孩子要比具有较低社会阶层的父母的孩子更能在学校取得成功,这其中的机制是如何?本文使用中国教育追踪调查(CEPS)基线调查数据检验了中产阶层和劳工阶层教养方式,一定程度上验证了 Annette Lareau提出的中产阶层家庭的教养方式称为"协作培养"(concerted cultivation),工人阶层的教养称作"顺其自然的成长"(natural growth)理论,但在语言使用上中产阶层与劳工阶层并无差异。本文进一步分析了家长这种"协作培养"方式是家长自己父母给他们的环境造成的这种教养下一代的方式,还是后天因其所从事职业、自身教育水平影响的下一代教养方式。研究发现,父母的教养方式更多与父母自身后致因素(包括职业、教育程度等)有关,不论在中产阶层还是劳工阶层,父母的家长教养方式较少与自己原生家庭有密切关系,更多与自身所处的社会经济地位有关系。"协作培养"方式是具有"学习效应"的,并非是一种惯习传递造成的。中产阶层家庭的子女相较于劳工阶层家庭子女在写家长、补习班布置的作业,上校外辅导班(与课业有关)时间上要多与劳工阶层。家长通过协作培养教养方式完成了孩子学业成绩的分化,这在一定程度上揭示了社会阶层再生产的机制。父母不需要用明了的方式让孩子有教育和职业目标,只要使得价值理念深入孩子生活,自然而然完成学术领域目标。这种家庭环境影响下,形成了中产阶层传递优势,而劳工阶层传递劣势这种再生产机制。
[Abstract]:In modern society, education is the intermediary of intergenerational mobility, academic achievement is regarded as an important indicator of children's future economic situation, and education acquisition is one of the most important mechanisms affecting social mobility. What is the mechanism by which a child of a higher social class parent can be more successful in school than a child with a lower social class parent? This paper uses the (CEPS) baseline survey data of the China Education tracking Survey to test the upbringing patterns of the middle class and the working class. To some extent, it verifies that the upbringing of middle class families proposed by Annette Lareau is called "cooperative cultivation" (concerted cultivation),. The working-class upbringing is called the "let it go" (natural growth) theory, but in language use there is no difference between the middle class and the working class. This paper further analyzes whether the "cooperative cultivation" of parents is the way of bringing up the next generation because of their own parents' environment, or whether it is the way of the next generation which is influenced by their occupation and their own level of education. The study found that the parenting style of parents is more related to their own factors (including occupation, level of education, etc.). Whether in the middle class or the working class, parents' parenting style is less closely related to their native family. It has more to do with its social and economic status. " Cooperative cultivation is a learning effect, not a habit transfer. The children of middle class families are more likely to work with the working class than their working class children in writing homework for parents, cram schools, and attending outside classes (related to schoolwork). Parents have completed the differentiation of their children's academic achievement through cooperative cultivation and upbringing, which to some extent reveals the mechanism of social stratum reproduction. Parents do not need to make their children have educational and career goals in a clear way, as long as the values are embedded in their children's lives, they naturally accomplish academic goals. Under the influence of this family environment, the middle-class transfer advantage, and the labor class transfer inferiority this reproduction mechanism.
【学位授予单位】：上海社会科学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：C913.1
本文编号：2419170
[Abstract]:In modern society, education is the intermediary of intergenerational mobility, academic achievement is regarded as an important indicator of children's future economic situation, and education acquisition is one of the most important mechanisms affecting social mobility. What is the mechanism by which a child of a higher social class parent can be more successful in school than a child with a lower social class parent? This paper uses the (CEPS) baseline survey data of the China Education tracking Survey to test the upbringing patterns of the middle class and the working class. To some extent, it verifies that the upbringing of middle class families proposed by Annette Lareau is called "cooperative cultivation" (concerted cultivation),. The working-class upbringing is called the "let it go" (natural growth) theory, but in language use there is no difference between the middle class and the working class. This paper further analyzes whether the "cooperative cultivation" of parents is the way of bringing up the next generation because of their own parents' environment, or whether it is the way of the next generation which is influenced by their occupation and their own level of education. The study found that the parenting style of parents is more related to their own factors (including occupation, level of education, etc.). Whether in the middle class or the working class, parents' parenting style is less closely related to their native family. It has more to do with its social and economic status. " Cooperative cultivation is a learning effect, not a habit transfer. The children of middle class families are more likely to work with the working class than their working class children in writing homework for parents, cram schools, and attending outside classes (related to schoolwork). Parents have completed the differentiation of their children's academic achievement through cooperative cultivation and upbringing, which to some extent reveals the mechanism of social stratum reproduction. Parents do not need to make their children have educational and career goals in a clear way, as long as the values are embedded in their children's lives, they naturally accomplish academic goals. Under the influence of this family environment, the middle-class transfer advantage, and the labor class transfer inferiority this reproduction mechanism.
【学位授予单位】：上海社会科学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：C913.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杨中超;;教育扩招促进了代际流动?[J];社会;2016年06期
2 李忠路;邱泽奇;;家庭背景如何影响儿童学业成就?——义务教育阶段家庭社会经济地位影响差异分析[J];社会学研究;2016年04期
3 刘在花;;父母教育期望对中学生学习投入影响机制的研究[J];中国特殊教育;2015年09期
4 刘保中;张月云;李建新;;家庭社会经济地位与青少年教育期望:父母参与的中介作用[J];北京大学教育评论;2015年03期
5 叶晓阳;丁延庆;;扩张的中国高等教育:教育质量与社会分层[J];社会;2015年03期
6 唐俊超;;输在起跑线——再议中国社会的教育不平等(1978-2008)[J];社会学研究;2015年03期
7 刘保中;张月云;李建新;;社会经济地位、文化观念与家庭教育期望[J];青年研究;2014年06期
8 杨春华;;农村家庭的教育期望与策略安排——基于苏北农村调查的分析[J];中国青年研究;2014年04期
9 李春玲;;教育不平等的年代变化趋势(1940-2010)——对城乡教育机会不平等的再考察[J];社会学研究;2014年02期
10 王甫勤;时怡雯;;家庭背景、教育期望与大学教育获得基于上海市调查数据的实证研究[J];社会;2014年01期
，本文编号：2419170
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/shgj/2419170.html
