顾颉刚在厦门大学的《尚书》讲义——兼论顾颉刚“王肃伪造说”的学术史背景和意义

发布时间：2018-02-20 06:34

本文关键词： 顾颉刚伪《古文尚书》王肃郑玄经今文学　出处：《史学史研究》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：顾颉刚1926年任厦门大学史学研究教授,承担"经学专书研究"课程。这是他首次承担的课程,而且是他之后连续撰写的《尚书》讲义的开端。本文除了利用《顾颉刚全集》所收的有关厦门大学讲义的史料以外,还利用顾颉刚的原稿和在大学发布的油印本,试图全面梳理此次厦门大学讲义的内容。顾颉刚此次的讲义,基本上只讲到《伪古文尚书》的造伪和辨伪,他主要根据丁晏的说法指出《伪古文尚书》是王肃伪造的。这"王肃伪造说",顾颉刚开课时已有强烈反驳,现在看来已不成立。本文最后讨论顾颉刚的"王肃伪造说"的背景和意义,以期作为对学术思想史研究的一种方法上的反思。
[Abstract]:In 1926, Gu Jiegang became a professor of historical studies at Xiamen University, taking on the course of "the study of Classics in Special Books." this is the first course he has undertaken. Moreover, it was the beginning of a series of handouts he wrote later on. In addition to the historical data collected from Gu Jie-gang 's complete works about the lectures of Xiamen University, this article also used the original manuscript of Gu Jie-gang and the mimeographed version published at the university. Trying to comprehensively comb the contents of the lecture notes of Xiamen University. Gu Jiegang's handout basically only talks about the falsification and discrimination of "pseudo-ancient prose books". He mainly pointed out according to Ding Yan that "the pseudo-ancient prose Shang Shu" was forged by Wang Su. This "Wang Su forgery theory" was strongly refuted by Gu Jiegang when he started his class. At the end of this paper, the background and significance of Gu Jiegang's "Wang Su forgery Theory" are discussed in order to reflect on the method of studying the history of academic thought.
【作者单位】：日本福冈教育大学历史系;
【分类号】：K092

【相似文献】