表象与本体——安克斯密特的历史表现理论

发布时间：2018-04-17 20:21

本文选题：安克斯密特 + 历史表现　；参考：《史学理论研究》2013年01期

【摘要】：安克斯密特的历史表现理论与叙事实体理论一脉相承,都是历史学家构建的某种叙事性解释。历史表现理论认为,历史文本是对过去实在的一种模仿,是人们认识过去的一个途径。但在认识过去的过程中,由于手段逐渐成为目的,历史表象与历史本体的边界便模糊了。为了避免历史本体的消解,历史表现理论要求历史表现既要与历史本体相似,又要与之保持距离,这就使之陷入两难境地。安克斯密特认为,历史表现继承了叙事实体的整体性和实体性,是客观世界的真实存在,他强调表现与被表现者在本体论上的地位是相等的,甚至本体的存在和对于本体的认识均有赖于其表象。这超出了人们惯常接受的认识论范围,使历史研究者不必再为恢复历史的原有面貌而煞费苦心。
[Abstract]:Ankersmitt's historical performance theory and narrative entity theory are in the same line, and they are some narrative explanations constructed by historians.The theory of historical expression holds that the historical text is a kind of imitation of the past reality and a way for people to understand the past.However, in the process of understanding the past, the boundary between historical representation and historical ontology is blurred because means gradually become the end.In order to avoid the elimination of the historical ontology, the theory of historical expression requires that the historical expression should be similar to the historical Noumenon and keep a distance from it, which makes it in a dilemma.Ankersmitt believes that historical performance inherits the entirety and entity of narrative entity and is the real existence of the objective world. He emphasizes that performance is equal to the position of the person represented in ontology.Even the existence of Noumenon and the understanding of Noumenon depend on its appearance.This is beyond the accepted epistemology, so that history researchers no longer have to take pains to restore the original appearance of history.
【作者单位】：河南大学历史文化学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“叙事主义历史哲学家群体研究”的阶段性成果之一,项目编号:12YJCZH104
【分类号】：K0

【参考文献】