安克施密特的“历史经验”理论述评

发布时间：2018-05-21 16:34

本文选题：叙事 + 再现　；参考：《北京师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2010年02期

【摘要】：从20世纪90年代开始,为了创新哲学和史学理论,经过十多年的思考和酝酿,安克施密特精心构建了一套旨在超越叙述主义的"历史经验"理论。"历史经验"是反再现主义的,它排斥语言和叙事,先于主客二分。对安克施密特来说,最重要的也是最基本的历史经验形式是"崇高的历史经验"。"崇高"与"创伤"紧密相连,"创伤"可以被看作是"崇高"在心理学上的对应物,而"崇高"则可以被看作是"创伤"在哲学上的对应物。由于"历史经验"所表现出来的某些神秘主义和非理性主义特征,它已经遭到一些学者的质疑和批评。但是,我们不妨谨慎地预期,"经验"概念如果不能独立构筑一个新的史学理论范式,起码也会成为新范式或新话语中的关键词。
[Abstract]:From the 1990s, in order to innovate philosophy and historical theory, after more than a decade of thinking and brewing, Ankerschmitt carefully constructed a set of "historical experience" theory aimed at transcending narrattism. " Historical experience is anti-reappearance, it rejects language and narration, and precedes the subject and object. The most important and basic form of historical experience for Ankerschmitt is the "noble historical experience." Sublimity "is closely related to" trauma "," trauma "can be regarded as the psychological counterpart of" nobility ", and" sublime "can be regarded as the philosophical counterpart of" trauma ". Historical experience has been questioned and criticized by some scholars because of its mysticism and irrationalism. However, we may carefully anticipate that if the concept of "experience" cannot independently construct a new paradigm of historical theory, it will at least become the key word in the new paradigm or new discourse.
【作者单位】：中国石油大学(北京)人文社会科学学院;
【分类号】：K0

【相似文献】