城市环境史研究发展过程中的重要学术现象探析
发布时间：2018-08-04 11:02
【摘要】：城市环境史在其近20年的发展历程中,出现了一些值得思考的学术现象。首先,一场关于城市是不是环境史研究对象的学术争论不仅肯定了城市环境史研究的必要性,更推进了环境史的理论思考。其次,在城市环境史研究范式的转变上,新一代学者提出了用"政治文化路径"分析补充"技术路径"分析的主张,并最终改变了城市环境史研究的面貌。再次,因为空间尺度和研究对象的差异,城市环境史研究出现了"内在论"和"外在论"两种方向。但不同学者在坚持各自方向的同时,也在尝试进行综合,力图写出更全面的城市环境史。回顾城市环境史以往发展历程中的这些现象,有助于中国学者开展新的研究。
[Abstract]:In the development of urban environmental history in recent 20 years, there are some academic phenomena worth thinking about. First of all, an academic debate on whether a city is an object of environmental history not only affirms the necessity of the study of urban environmental history, but also promotes the theoretical thinking of environmental history. Secondly, in the transformation of the research paradigm of urban environmental history, a new generation of scholars put forward the idea of supplementing the analysis of "technical path" with the analysis of "political and cultural path", and finally changed the face of the study of urban environmental history. Thirdly, due to the difference of spatial scale and object of study, there are two directions in the study of urban environmental history: "internal theory" and "external theory". But different scholars are trying to synthesize and write a more comprehensive history of urban environment. Reviewing these phenomena in the history of urban environment is helpful for Chinese scholars to carry out new research.
【作者单位】： 北京师范大学历史学院;
【基金】：梅雪芹教授主持的教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地北京师范大学史学理论与史学史研究中心基金资助项目《环境史研究与20世纪中国史学》(项目批号:06JJD770004) 北京师范大学自主科研基金资助项目《近现代华北地区现代化进程的环境史研究》(2009AC-1)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：K091
[Abstract]:In the development of urban environmental history in recent 20 years, there are some academic phenomena worth thinking about. First of all, an academic debate on whether a city is an object of environmental history not only affirms the necessity of the study of urban environmental history, but also promotes the theoretical thinking of environmental history. Secondly, in the transformation of the research paradigm of urban environmental history, a new generation of scholars put forward the idea of supplementing the analysis of "technical path" with the analysis of "political and cultural path", and finally changed the face of the study of urban environmental history. Thirdly, due to the difference of spatial scale and object of study, there are two directions in the study of urban environmental history: "internal theory" and "external theory". But different scholars are trying to synthesize and write a more comprehensive history of urban environment. Reviewing these phenomena in the history of urban environment is helpful for Chinese scholars to carry out new research.
【作者单位】： 北京师范大学历史学院;
【基金】：梅雪芹教授主持的教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地北京师范大学史学理论与史学史研究中心基金资助项目《环境史研究与20世纪中国史学》(项目批号:06JJD770004) 北京师范大学自主科研基金资助项目《近现代华北地区现代化进程的环境史研究》(2009AC-1)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：K091
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 包茂宏;马丁·麦乐西与美国城市环境史研究[J];中国历史地理论丛;2004年04期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 高国荣;年鉴学派与环境史学[J];史学理论研究;2005年03期
2 梅雪芹;;从环境的历史到环境史——关于环境史研究的一种认识[J];学术研究;2006年09期
3 格非;;公共史与环境史[J];学术研究;2006年10期
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 王福昌;生态·社会·共同体[D];上海师范大学;2006年
2 高凯;地理环境与中国古代社会变迁三论[D];复旦大学;2006年
3 贾s，
本文编号：2163753
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/sxll/2163753.html
