书写帝国——西利、卢卡斯、艾格顿与英帝国史

发布时间：2018-08-06 22:10

【摘要】：自19世纪末开始,西利、卢卡斯与艾格顿相继注意到了英帝国的历史,但是三人的英帝国史书写并非处在同一个学术与政治脉络当中。西利支持帝国联邦论,把国家当作历史学研究最主要的对象,认为英帝国就是英格兰国家的扩大,其撰写英帝国史仅是延续了以往清理麦考莱史学遗产,重整英国历史学的思路,所以他没有开辟新领域的自觉意识。英帝国史的学科化与普及化得益于帝国联邦论没落后出现的帝国研究热潮。卢卡斯与艾格顿在其中发挥了重要作用,因而可以被视为奠定英帝国史研究与教学框架的主要推动者。他们的英帝国史书写中个人的角色及道德说教的意味更加明显,而这与其证明英帝国是一个"好帝国",维护帝国统治正当性的意图有关。
[Abstract]:Since the end of the 19th century, Ciley, Lucas and Aggleton have noticed the history of the British Empire, but the history of the British Empire is not written in the same academic and political context. Ciley supported the imperial federalism and regarded the state as the main object of historical research. He believed that the British Empire was the expansion of the English state, and that its writing of the history of the British Empire merely continued to clean up the historical heritage of Macaulay. He did not have the conscious consciousness to open up a new field because he reorganized the thought of British history. The subjectivization and popularization of the history of the British Empire benefited from the upsurge of imperial research after the fall of the Imperial Federalism. Lucas and Aggleton play an important role in it and can be regarded as the main promoters of the research and teaching framework of British imperial history. Their personal role and moral preaching in the writing of the history of the British Empire are more obvious, and this is related to their intention to prove that the British Empire is a "good empire" and to uphold the legitimacy of imperial rule.
【作者单位】：东北师范大学历史文化学院;
【分类号】：K091

【相似文献】