《国史大纲》与《中国史纲》比较研究
[Abstract]:Two historical masterpieces, outline of Chinese History and outline of Chinese History, were written in the 1930s and 1940s. In terms of the purpose of writing history, Qian Mu's outline of the History of China is intended to awaken the soul of the country through historiography, excavate the confidence of Chinese culture, and stimulate the firm belief that people will win the War of Resistance against Japan. On the other hand, Zhang Yulin's "outline of Chinese History" was influenced by the low knowledge of Chinese history in senior high school students at that time. Therefore, the popularization of historical knowledge was regarded as the "help of self-knowledge" in the period of unprecedented change of the nation. On the thought of historiography, Qian Mu summed up the essence of history with culture, life and life, and formed a unique view of the history of national culture and the rich cultural atmosphere of the outline of National History. The deep national emotion is the concentrated embodiment of this historical view; Zhang Yulin, on the other hand, combines traditional classical history with western philosophy and sociology, and holds that historiography is the combination of science and art. In the outline of Chinese History, the historical personnel presents a scientific spirit and artistic demeanor by choosing the historical materials of literature. As for the style of the two books, the outline of Chinese History sublates the traditional syllabus, merges the chapters, arranges the chapters in chronological order, and forms a complete vein of general history because of the order and vertical connection, and the horizontal connection between the two books. "the narrative of history in the way of telling a story" in the outline of Chinese History merges the end of the chronicle, the chronology and the chapter, giving full play to the advantages of the chronicle itself, as well as the fact that the chronology is good at accommodating and synthesizing the essence and the end of the chronicle, as well as the characteristics of the chronology being good at accommodating and synthesizing. Formed a "new chronicle, the end of the body." In the aspect of historical narration, the outline of National History emphasizes the national standard, the national standard and the decisive function of the national culture to the historical development, and its writing narration is full of strong and deep emotion; The outline of Chinese History emphasizes that "the change of society, the contribution of thought, and the character of some important figures" should be taken into account, and the narrative in writing shows the characteristics of cold, rational introversion and peace.
【学位授予单位】:淮北师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:K092
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 ;《二十世纪中国史纲》一书出版[J];百年潮;2009年11期
2 张霞;;文学与史学互融——张荫麟《中国史纲》文学性赏析[J];黑龙江史志;2009年22期
3 李文海;;反映百年中国社会变革的一部信史——评金冲及《二十世纪中国史纲》[J];历史研究;2010年01期
4 齐世荣;;总结历史经验 争取新的胜利——评金冲及著《二十世纪中国史纲》[J];近代史研究;2010年05期
5 黄道炫;;大手笔下的大世纪——金冲及著《二十世纪中国史纲》读后[J];近代史研究;2010年05期
6 周溯源;;世纪回眸 启人心智——读《二十世纪中国史纲》[J];求是;2010年22期
7 焦鹏;;历史怎么讲——《中国史纲》的实践及启示[J];历史教学(中学版);2009年02期
8 卜鑫;;论张荫麟及其《中国史纲》[J];西安社会科学;2009年05期
9 刘立志;;一个国家的百年苦难与梦想——金冲及谈中国近现代史研究[J];江淮文史;2010年01期
10 张霞;;张荫麟史学思想探析——以《中国史纲》为例[J];湖北广播电视大学学报;2010年10期
相关重要报纸文章 前5条
1 戴海斌 上海社会科学院历史研究所;从《近代中国史》到《近代中国史纲》:郭廷以史学的整合特色[N];中国社会科学报;2010年
2 王晓清;张荫麟和《中国史纲》[N];社会科学报;2001年
3 陈卫平;“通俗历史热”与学校历史课本的编写[N];解放日报;2007年
4 南方日报记者 金强 林旭娜;他真有学问真有才[N];南方日报;2010年
5 东莞市教育局 王俊桦;史学奇才——张荫麟[N];东莞日报;2013年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 朱超杰;《国史大纲》与《中国史纲》比较研究[D];淮北师范大学;2017年
2 张琳琳;张荫麟《中国史纲》研究[D];华中师范大学;2013年
3 常城;张荫麟史学研究[D];河南师范大学;2013年
,本文编号:2446060
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/sxll/2446060.html