论中国近代史学的开端与转变

发布时间：2019-04-17 07:41

【摘要】：鸦片战争后逐渐兴起的西北边疆史地研究、介绍外国史地知识、当代史撰述等趋向,最多只可视为时代在史学领域的某种反映,尚难构成对历史学整体面貌的改观。20世纪初期由梁启超发表的《中国史叙论》和《新史学》为标志而形成"新史学"思潮的出现,应视为中国近代史学的开端。"新史学"之后,从国粹派"保存国粹"的呼吁和沟通中西学术的尝试,再到"整理国故"运动对传统学术的"整理"态度,直到胡适明确提出"做成中国文化史"的学术目标,在学术体系方面有效打通了新旧史学的界限,从学科分类的角度指明了从古代史学到近代史学的转变方式。以新材料、新方法、新问题为中心而形成的中国史学"新潮流",明确了中国近代史学开始阶段的研究路径。
[Abstract]:After the Opium War, the study of the history and geography of the northwest frontier, which introduced the knowledge of foreign history and the writing of contemporary history, can at best be regarded as a reflection of the times in the field of historiography. At the beginning of the 20th century, the emergence of "New historiography", marked by Liang Qichao's "narrative of Chinese History" and "New historiography", should be regarded as the beginning of modern Chinese historiography. " After the new historiography, from the appeal of the quintessence of the Chinese nation to "preserve the quintessence of the country" and the attempt to communicate the Chinese and the western academic, to the "sorting out the national culture" movement's attitude towards the traditional academic "arrangement", until Hu Shi clearly put forward the academic goal of "making the history of Chinese culture" clear. In the aspect of academic system, the boundary between the new and the old historiography has been opened up effectively, and the mode of transformation from ancient historiography to modern historiography has been pointed out from the point of view of discipline classification. The "new trend" of Chinese historiography, which is centered on new materials, new methods and new problems, clarifies the research path of the beginning stage of Chinese modern historiography.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学历史学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“唯物史观与历史考证学派关系研究”(项目编号:13BZS006)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：K092

【相似文献】