当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 外交论文 >

中日敌意的原因起源

发布时间:2018-05-01 19:41

  本文选题:中日敌意 + 中日历史 ; 参考:《浙江大学》2013年硕士论文


【摘要】:对于多数中国人,不论其他的起源或观点,日本侵略,日本的战争犯罪的否认,缺乏道歉,和其他的问题都还是一个讨论的问题。在政客,史学家,学者和日本公民和中国公民之间有争论。日方,仍有许多努力减少或否认日本的战争犯罪。 这份论文说明,为了更好了解和估计今天的情况,日本和中国之间的双边关系应该评估用历史的角度。通过两个国家的历史和他们最重要的联络,这份论文调查今天相互敌意的原因。从原因的分析这份论文出示未来外型。这个未来外型让我们了解很重要的未来情况。 这个工作的历史原始资料是日本课本、在日本官员之间会话的报告,证人日志和报纸的战争报告,日本和中国政府的官方信函和公告,而中国和日本历史的书。 在两个国家历史的背景中有了效果支持而下倾中日敌意的原因。一方面中国给许多联系的可能性,但是中国政府作出了很少的努力为了阻止民族主义感觉成长在中国公民之中。从日本角度和看待中国的历史这导致了更加敌对的紧张。 日方表示了歉意,但是中国官员和民众的多数没赞赏。而且日本偿还的,没满意北京。不仅皇帝为它的罪行未曾被指责,而且日本的小赎罪永不关1894日本占领或者南京大屠杀的伤口。 最后两个国家互相的意图和态度都没有明确,因此引导更远紧张的这种一再导致的新的误解。 结论为中国提供侵略的日本的历史可能不再是避免的借口维护国际稳定的负担,两者都不抗议反对一个扩展日本角色。日本对它稳定的政治和社会的信用和尊敬值得。并且中国应受继续的信誉能获得在经济政治的领域的进展。两个国家必须说实话跟彼此,必须没有友谊幻觉,但是必须以真正的自愿建立根据共同利益合作。此外,中国和日本应该有新的视觉和决心去除是强的民族主义神话和促进共有的历史通过相互批评和反射。在这份论文是显示出,强的民族主义将冷冻机会有一新的正面中日联系。总而言之,这份论文也争辩说,这争执是易处理的,只要二个政府了解公开敌对不是任一个国家的利益,并且强的合作是根本的。虽然在二个国家之间的一种最近冲突不是可预测的,两个国家将采取的未来路线是未知的。它是希望象这份论文的工作贡献往在越来越获取在亚洲球形的重要性并且一个世界舞台的两个国家之中的一个平安和相互全面关系。
[Abstract]:For most Chinese, regardless of other origins or views, Japanese aggression, Japan's denial of war crimes, lack of apology, and other issues are still a matter of discussion. There are arguments between politicians, historians, scholars and Japanese and Chinese citizens. On the Japanese side, there are still many efforts to reduce or deny Japan's war crimes. In order to better understand and estimate today's situation, the bilateral relationship between Japan and China should be evaluated from a historical perspective, the paper said. Based on the history of the two countries and their most important contacts, this paper examines the reasons for today's hostility. Analyze the cause of this paper and present its future appearance. This future shape gives us an important picture of the future. The historical sources of this work are Japanese textbooks, reports on conversations between Japanese officials, witness logs and newspaper war reports, official letters and announcements from the Japanese and Chinese governments, and books on Chinese and Japanese history. In the context of the history of the two countries, there is the effect of backing down the hostility between China and Japan. On the one hand, China has offered many possibilities, but the Chinese government has done little to prevent nationalistic feelings from growing up among Chinese citizens. Looking at China's history from a Japanese point of view and looking at it has led to more hostile tensions. Japan apologized, but most Chinese officials and the public did not appreciate it. And Japan's repayment, not satisfied with Beijing. Not only was the emperor unaccused of his crimes, but Japan's little atonement never closed the wounds of 1894 Japanese occupation or the Nanjing Massacre. The last two countries have no clear intentions and attitudes towards each other, leading to new misunderstandings that lead to further tension. Conclusion the history of Japan, which provides aggression to China, may no longer be an excuse to avoid the burden of maintaining international stability, neither protesting against an expanded Japanese role. Japan deserves credit and respect for its stable politics and society. And China deserves continued credibility to make progress in economic and political fields. Two countries must be honest with each other, must have no illusion of friendship, but must establish cooperation on the basis of mutual interest on a genuine voluntary basis. In addition, China and Japan should have new vision and determination to remove myths that are strongly nationalist and promote shared history through mutual criticism and reflection. In this paper it is shown that strong nationalism will have a new positive relationship between China and Japan. All in all, the paper argues that the dispute is manageable as long as two governments understand that open hostility is not a national interest and that strong cooperation is fundamental. Although a recent conflict between two countries is not predictable, the future path they will take is unknown. It is hoped that work like this paper will contribute to a peaceful and comprehensive relationship between two countries in the growing importance of the Asian sphere and a world stage.
【学位授予单位】:浙江大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D822.3;D831.3

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 石其宝;;“肯定列表制度”对中日农产品贸易的影响[J];法治论丛(上海政法学院学报);2008年01期

2 顾肖荣;;中日经济犯罪概念和范围的演进[J];东方法学;2008年01期

3 王若茜;;中日市民宗教意识的差异——以“浮世草子”和“三言二拍”为中心[J];东北亚论坛;2006年05期

4 汪毅刚;李颖;;论民族大义下的中日钓鱼岛问题[J];河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年01期

5 周珊珊;从均势角度谈中日关系的走向[J];徐州教育学院学报;2001年02期

6 管秀兰;从生活习俗看中日文化差异[J];山东省青年管理干部学院学报;2004年03期

7 朱卫新;中日茶文化的异同[J];东北亚论坛;1999年01期

8 ;中日椨,

本文编号:1830787


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/waijiao/1830787.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户f75a6***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com