从地区性的哀思到全民性的欢愉——寒食节的诠释史研究

发布时间：2018-06-07 06:57

本文选题：寒食节 + 介子推　；参考：《民俗研究》2017年06期

【摘要】：改火说和子推说是目前学术界关于寒食起源的两大观点,一直以来争论不休。其实这两种观点是古人对寒食起源不同解释的延续。两汉魏晋南北朝,子推说是寒食起源的唯一阐释;隋唐时代出现了改火禁火说并很快占据主流地位,玄宗时以国家意志固定下来,成为后世关于寒食起源的定论。寒食起源的诠释之所以在隋唐时期发生改变,是寒食节自身发展的结果,也是唐王朝为加强统治,而为其注入新因素的结果。寒食节的重新诠释,成为皇权宣示统治合法性、借儒家思想来整合民间社会的一种方式。
[Abstract]:The theory of changing fire and the theory of son inference are the two major viewpoints about the origin of cold food in academic circles, which have been debated all the time. In fact, these two views are the continuation of the ancients' different interpretations of the origin of cold food. In the Han Dynasty, Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern dynasties, Zi inference was the only explanation of the origin of cold food. During the Sui and Tang dynasties, the theory of changing fire and banning fire quickly occupied the mainstream position, and the Xuanzong fixed it with the national will, which became the final conclusion of the origin of cold food in later generations. The explanation of the origin of cold food changed in the Sui and Tang dynasties, which was the result of the development of the cold food festival itself, and also the result of the Tang Dynasty infusing new factors to strengthen its rule. The reinterpretation of the Cold Food Festival has become a way for the imperial power to declare the legitimacy of rule and to integrate civil society with Confucianism.
【作者单位】：南京师范大学社会发展学院;
【分类号】：K892.11

【相似文献】