当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 心理论文 >

具身视角下宣誓姿势对评价与预测他人道德行为的影响

发布时间:2018-03-05 01:29

  本文选题:具身认知 切入点:宣誓姿势 出处:《山东师范大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:具身认知是指具体的身体状态及其所处的环境会影响个体的认知,具身认知理论作为认知研究中的后起之秀,在近几年的认知研究中崭露头角,并在道德研究领域备受关注。已有研究表明具体的身体姿势会对自己的道德决策产生影响,但是个体做出某种身体姿势后是否也会影响对他人道德行为的评价与预测,目前鲜有这方面的研究。因此,本研究将从具身认知的视角,探讨被试做出某种身体姿势对评价与预测他人道德行为的影响。由于在我国文化中宣誓普遍存在于人们的生活工作中,如入团宣誓、入党宣誓以及入职宣誓,因此本研究选取“宣誓”的身体姿势作为具身线索,检验在与宣誓有关或无关的道德情景中该姿势对他人道德行为评价与预测的影响。另外,本研究还将探讨情绪在“宣誓”身体姿势对预测他人道德行为影响中的中介作用。实验1采用3(身体姿势:宣誓姿势、非宣誓姿势、不做姿势)×2(道德情景:与宣誓有关、与宣誓无关)完全被试间实验设计,探讨被试做出“宣誓”姿势对评价他人道德行为的影响。实验2采用2(身体姿势:宣誓姿势、非宣誓姿势)×2(道德情景:与宣誓有关、与宣誓无关)混合实验设计,身体姿势为被试间变量,道德情景为被试内变量,探讨姿势对预测他人道德行为的影响以及情绪在其中的中介作用。在实验1中要求被试做出相应的身体姿势后对道德两难情景中主人公的行为进行评价;在实验2中首先要求被试做出相应的身体姿势,然后测量其情绪,最后对道德两难情景中主人公的道德行为进行预测。结果发现:(1)做出宣誓姿势的被试对他人行为的评价更为严格;(2)在与宣誓有关的情景中,做出宣誓姿势的被试预测他人行为更加符合规范,而在与宣誓无关的情景中宣誓姿势不会影响被试对他人道德行为的预测;(3)在与宣誓有关的情景中,预测他人行为更符合道德规范是以做出宣誓姿势后产生的积极情绪体验为中介的。研究结果证实了“宣誓”姿势对评价与预测他人道德行为的影响,扩展了具身道德的研究,丰富了具身道德理论在我国文化下的研究结果,并为进一步研究身体姿势对道德认知的影响提供了参考。
[Abstract]:Physical cognition refers to the specific physical state and its environment will affect individual cognition. As a rising star in cognitive research, the theory of physical cognition has emerged in the cognitive research in recent years. It has been shown that specific body posture may have an impact on one's own moral decision, but whether an individual makes a certain body posture will also influence the evaluation and prediction of other people's moral behavior. At present, there are few studies in this field. Therefore, the present study will be conducted from the perspective of physical cognition. To explore the influence of subjects' making a certain body posture on evaluating and predicting the moral behavior of others. Because in our country's culture, oath exists in people's life and work, such as the oath of joining the regiment, the oath of joining the party and the oath of entry. Therefore, this study selected the body posture of "oath" as body cues to examine the influence of the posture on the evaluation and prediction of other people's moral behavior in a moral situation related to or unrelated to oath. This study will also explore the role of emotion in the role of emotion in "swearing" body posture in predicting the moral behavior of others. Experiment 1 used 3 (body posture: swearing posture, non-swearing posture, no pose) 脳 2 (moral scenario: related to oath). The experiment was designed to explore the effect of taking "oath" posture on the evaluation of other people's moral behavior. Experiment 2 used 2 (body posture: sworn posture, non-sworn posture) 脳 2 (moral situation: related to oath). The body posture was a variable between subjects, and the moral situation was a variable within the subjects. In experiment 1, subjects were asked to make a corresponding body posture to evaluate the behavior of the protagonist in the moral dilemma. In experiment 2, the subjects were first asked to make the corresponding body posture, and then their emotions were measured. Finally, the moral behavior of the protagonist in the moral dilemma was predicted. It was found that: 1) the subjects who took the oath posture had a more rigorous assessment of the behavior of others. (2) in the situation related to the oath, The subjects who made the swearing posture predicted that the behavior of others was more in line with the norm, but in situations not related to the oath, the swearing posture did not affect the subjects' prediction of the moral behavior of others. Predicting the behavior of others more in line with moral norms is mediated by the positive emotional experience generated by taking the oath posture. The results confirm the influence of the "oath" posture on the evaluation and prediction of the moral behavior of others, and expand the research on physical morality. It enriches the research results of the theory of physical morality in Chinese culture and provides a reference for further study of the influence of body posture on moral cognition.
【学位授予单位】:山东师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:B842.1

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 乔婷;;简论我国宪法宣誓制度及其重大意义[J];法制与社会;2016年25期

2 叶红燕;张凤华;;从具身视角看道德判断[J];心理科学进展;2015年08期

3 陈潇;江琦;侯敏;朱梦音;;具身道德:道德心理学研究的新取向[J];心理发展与教育;2014年06期

4 殷融;叶浩生;;道德概念的黑白隐喻表征及其对道德认知的影响[J];心理学报;2014年09期

5 孙晓玲;吴明证;;社会距离知觉对道德判断的影响研究[J];应用心理学;2013年02期

6 王锃;鲁忠义;;道德概念的垂直空间隐喻及其对认知的影响[J];心理学报;2013年05期

7 殷融;苏得权;叶浩生;;具身认知视角下的概念隐喻理论[J];心理科学进展;2013年02期

8 钟毅平;陈海洪;;心理距离对道德行为判断的影响[J];心理学探新;2013年01期

9 张伟胜;;敬畏感及其中西比较[J];浙江社会科学;2012年08期

10 李小平;杨晟宇;李梦遥;;权威人格与权力感对道德思维方式的影响[J];心理学报;2012年07期

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 陈巍;;具身认知研究面临可重复性危机[N];中国社会科学报;2014年

相关硕士学位论文 前8条

1 宋慧萍;趋避行为对道德判断的影响[D];湖南师范大学;2015年

2 李桂娴;情绪与事件类型对大学生道德判断影响的实证研究[D];四川师范大学;2014年

3 郑剑锋;不道德情景中弱势者道德优势效应及其影响因素[D];宁波大学;2014年

4 邓康乐;消极情绪对道德判断影响的实验研究[D];福建师范大学;2012年

5 徐迪;道德事件类型与道德判断情景对大学生道德判断影响研究[D];四川师范大学;2012年

6 陈梦琳;自我卷入度低与自我卷入度高情境下道德判断的时程加工特点[D];杭州师范大学;2012年

7 阚忠钰;心理距离对道德判断的影响[D];西南大学;2010年

8 金磊;宣誓制度研究[D];苏州大学;2006年



本文编号:1568178

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/1568178.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户02fb3***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com