汉字音形加工的错误记忆研究

发布时间：2018-03-23 15:52

本文选题：错误记忆　切入点：字音加工　出处：《闽南师范大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：研究目的：研究一从汉字字音、字形加工出发研究大学生、聋哑学生被试在汉字字音、字形加工条件下的错误记忆表现，同时对比大学生、聋哑学生的记忆表现；研究二将字形关联材料独立出来进行研究，为了进一步研究多音声旁、相同形旁条件下大学生、聋哑学生被试的错误记忆表现，通过两种被试的记忆表现之间的差异比较探讨两种被试的汉字加工特点，同时通过两类被试在多音声旁、相同形旁条件下的各自记忆差异比较分析研究汉字字形关联错误记忆的特点。研究三将汉字的音、形加工和语义加工联系在一起，，使用DRM范式中的DRM词列及汉字的声调、结构判断，研究汉字字音字形加工在语义激活的基础上对错误记忆的影响，同时在学习测验阶段之间加入预警处理，观察预警处理对错误记忆的影响。研究结果：（1）大学生、聋哑学生在字音、字形关联材料条件下都出现了错误记忆；在字音、字形关联材料条件下，聋哑学生被试的关键诱饵、无关项目再认率显著高于大学生被试的关键诱饵、无关项目再认率，两类被试在学习项目正确再认率之间不存在显著性差异。（2）两类被试在多音声旁、相同形旁关联材料条件下均出现了错误记忆；在多音声旁关联材料条件下，聋哑学生被试的关键诱饵、无关项目再认率显著高于大学生被试相应项目的再认率，大学生被试的学习项目正确再认率显著高于聋哑学生被试的学习项目再认率；在相同形旁关联材料条件下大学生、聋哑学生被试的学习项目、关键诱饵再认率之间均不存在显著性差异，聋哑学生被试的无关项目错误再认率显著高于大学生被试的无关项目错误再认率。（3）声调、结构判断条件下均出现了错误记忆；声调判断条件下的关键诱饵错误再认率显著高于结构判断条件下的关键诱饵错误再认率，学习项目正确再认率之间不存在差异；预警处理的关键诱饵错误再认率显著高于无预警处理的关键诱饵错误再认率，声调判断条件下预警和无预警处理的关键诱饵错误再认率之间不存在显著性差异，结构判断条件下预警处理的关键诱饵错误再认率显著高于无预警处理的关键诱饵错误再认率。研究结论：（1）字音、字形关联材料能够诱发错误记忆；（2）聋哑学生被试和大学生被试对汉字的字音、字形加工存在差异；（3）相对于声调判断而言，结构判断是特异性特征，能够减少错误记忆概率；（4）研究预警对错误记忆的影响，需要考虑预警处理的位置及整个实验的复杂性。
[Abstract]:Objective: to study the false memory performance of the deaf and mute students under the condition of Chinese character pronunciation and shape processing, and to compare the memory performance of the college students and the deaf mute students. In the second study, the glyph related materials were studied independently. In order to further study the false memory performance of the students with polyphonic side, the same shape side condition, the deaf and mute students, By comparing the differences between the two subjects' memory performance, the processing characteristics of Chinese characters of the two subjects were discussed, and at the same time, the two kinds of subjects were in the side of polyphonic sounds. Comparative Analysis of the memory differences between Chinese characters under the condition of the same side of the form the characteristics of the Chinese character form association error memory are analyzed. The third study links the phonetic processing and semantic processing of Chinese characters and uses the DRM word list in the DRM paradigm and the tone of Chinese characters. On the basis of semantic activation, the influence of Chinese phonetic processing on false memory is studied. At the same time, early warning processing is added between learning test stages to observe the influence of early warning processing on false memory. Results: 1) College students, deaf and mute students had false memories under the condition of phonetic and glyph related materials, and under the condition of phonetic and glyph related materials, the key bait for the deaf and mute students was found. The recognition rate of unrelated items was significantly higher than that of the key decoys of college students. There was no significant difference between the correct recognition rates of the two types of subjects in learning items. False memory appeared under the condition of the same correlate material, and the key bait and unrelated item recognition rate of deaf and mute students was significantly higher than that of the corresponding item recognition rate of college students under the condition of polyphonetic para-correlating material, and the relative item recognition rate of the deaf and mute students was significantly higher than that of the corresponding item. The correct recognition rate of the learning items of the college students was significantly higher than that of the deaf and mute students, and the learning items of the deaf and mute students were higher than those of the deaf and mute students under the condition of the same relative materials. There was no significant difference in the key decoy recognition rate. The rate of false recognition of unrelated items in deaf and dumb students was significantly higher than that in college students. The rate of key decoy error recognition under tone judgment is significantly higher than that under structural judgment, and there is no difference between the correct recognition rate of learning items. The recognition rate of key decoy error in early warning is significantly higher than that in key decoy without early warning, and there is no significant difference between the recognition rate of key decoy and that of key decoy without early warning under tone judgment. The key decoy error recognition rate of early warning is significantly higher than that of key decoy without early warning. The results showed that: (1) phonetic, glyph related materials could induce false memory. (2) there were differences in Chinese characters' pronunciation and shape processing between deaf and college students) compared with tone judgment, structural judgment was a specific feature. To study the influence of early warning on false memory, we need to consider the location of early warning and the complexity of the whole experiment.
【学位授予单位】：闽南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：B842.3

【参考文献】