题目措辞方向对孤独感测量的影响

发布时间：2018-03-25 19:02

  本文选题：直接措辞　切入点：反转措辞　出处：《中国临床心理学杂志》2017年01期

【摘要】：目的:比较UCLA-3(University of California Loneliness Scale-Version 3)和DLS(Differential Loneliness Scale)两个孤独量表的信效度,及直接和反转措辞题目的心理测量学性能。为比较直接和反转效应提供依据。方法:对UCLA-3和DLS的题目进行措辞方向的反转,得到直接和反转措辞两种版本,分别施测于高中生样本。两次测试结果合并后再得到原版量表的测试数据。结果:UCLA-3和DLS中直接措辞题的信效度略高于反转措辞题,但差异不大;DLS中的直接和反转措辞题目测量的是同一特质,题目措辞方向的改变不影响其所测的内容,但UCLA-3中的题目就不具备这些特性;两种措辞效应在DLS和UCLA-3中都存在,但DLS受其影响较小。结论:DLS有更高的信效度;措辞效应尽管影响DLS,但不严重;两种措辞题目可以相加计算总分;UCLA-3受措辞效应影响大,需要改进。
[Abstract]:Objective: to compare the reliability and validity of UCLA-3(University of California Loneliness Scale-Version 3 and DLS(Differential Loneliness scale. And the psychometric performance of direct and reverse wordings. This provides a basis for comparing direct and reverse effects. Methods: direct and reverse versions of UCLA-3 and DLS topics are obtained. The results showed that the reliability and validity of the direct word-question in the 10% UCLA-3 and DLS were slightly higher than those in the reverse word-question. However, the difference between direct and reverse wordings in DLSs is the same. The change in the direction of topic wording does not affect the content measured, but the topic in UCLA-3 does not have these characteristics; both word-effects exist in DLS and UCLA-3. Conclusion: DLS has a higher reliability and validity; the wordings effect is not serious although it affects DLSs; the two wordings can be added together to calculate that the total score UCLA-3 is greatly affected by the phrasing effect and needs to be improved.
【作者单位】： 山东师范大学心理学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“慈善捐助的心理诱发机制研究”(15BSH083) 教育部人文社科规划基金项目“利他行为的启动机制和内隐测量研究”(13YJA190006) 山东省“人类认知与行为发展”重点实验室建设项目
【分类号】：B842.6
，

本文编号：1664438