反向对抗逻辑范式的创立与证实——人工语法PDP对抗逻辑的改进
发布时间:2018-04-01 05:19
本文选题:形式相似性 切入点:受控反应 出处:《心理学报》2016年09期
【摘要】:人工语法对抗逻辑范式不能排除相似性和辨别力,导致自动反应不纯粹甚至虚假或无法检测到。本研究创立反向对抗逻辑范式,采用单因素(相容/对抗条件)被试间设计:内隐学习阶段将肯定标签与语法A绑定,否定标签与语法B绑定;测量阶段相容条件组对语法A和B做与学习阶段一致的判断,对抗条件组对语法B做与学习阶段对抗的肯定判断。实验证明:(1)外显否定标签可与语法B绑定学习而获得自动化特征,产生内隐联结自动化。(2)内隐否定知识比肯定知识更自动,知识从肯定转为否定易,从否定转为肯定难。(3)反向对抗逻辑范式能有效检测到自动反应,不受语法间形式相似性和辨别力影响。(4)首次析出高概率判断偏向效应,得到纯粹受控反应。
[Abstract]:The artificial grammar can not rule out the similarity and discrimination, which leads to the automatic reaction is not pure or even false or can not be detected. A single factor (compatibility / confrontation condition) design was used: the implicit learning stage binds the positive tag to the grammar A, the negative label and the grammar B; the group of consistent conditions in the measurement phase makes the same judgment on the grammar A and B as the learning stage. The experimental results show that explicit negative tags can be bound to grammar B to acquire automatic features, and that implicit negative knowledge is more automatic than positive knowledge. Knowledge is easy to change from positive to negative, and from negative to positive is difficult. The reverse antagonistic logic paradigm can effectively detect automatic reaction, and it is not influenced by grammatical similarity and discriminative force. It is the first time that the bias effect of high probability judgment is precipitated. A pure controlled reaction is obtained.
【作者单位】: 苏州大学教育学院;
【基金】:国家自然科学基金(31271084);国家自然科学基金(31540025)资助
【分类号】:B842.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 郭秀艳,杨治良;人工语法学习模型述评[J];心理学探新;2002年01期
2 高鑫;郑一筠;杨宝玲;;人工语法学习迁移效应研究进展[J];西北民族大学学报(自然科学版);2007年01期
3 ;[J];;年期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 李林;;人工语法学习中的知觉流畅性机制[A];第十届全国心理学学术大会论文摘要集[C];2005年
,本文编号:1694146
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/1694146.html