“善待宽恕者”还是“报复非宽恕者”:基于博弈范式对冒犯者得到宽恕以后行为动机的研究

发布时间：2018-06-12 15:28

  本文选题：宽恕 + 后续行为　； 参考：《心理与行为研究》2017年03期

【摘要】：近期国内外研究比较一致地认为冒犯者在得到宽恕后,不倾向于再次伤害被冒犯者。但这些研究并未解释冒犯者为什么这么做,是出于“善待宽恕者”的动机,还是出于“报复非宽恕者”的动机。为此,本研究通过囚徒困境的博弈范式研究了冒犯者得到宽恕以后的行为动机。结果显示,在“得到宽恕”的情境中,冒犯者善待对方的程度要显著高于“没有得到宽恕”和“不确定是否得到宽恕”的情境,而后两者之间没有显著差异。该结果一方面进一步验证了冒犯者得到宽恕以后不倾向于再次伤害对方的结论,另一方面也初步确定了冒犯者得到宽恕以后行为的动机,即“善待宽恕者”,而非“报复非宽恕者”,并对人际互动具有一定的指导意义。
[Abstract]:Recent studies at home and abroad agree that offenders do not tend to harm the offended again after being pardoned. But the studies do not explain why offenders are motivated to "treat forgiving" or "retaliate against unforgiving." Therefore, this study studies the behavior motivation of offenders after leniency through the game paradigm of prisoner's dilemma. The results showed that in the "forgiven" situation, the offender treated each other more well than the "unforgiven" and "uncertain forgiven" situations, but there was no significant difference between the latter two. On the one hand, the result further verifies the conclusion that the offender is not inclined to harm the other party again after being forgiven, and on the other hand, it preliminarily determines the motive of the offender's behavior after being forgiven, that is, "be kind to the forgiving person". It is not "revenge and not forgiving", and has certain guiding significance to interpersonal interaction.
，

本文编号：2010144