Rosenberg自尊量表题目的措辞效应
发布时间：2019-06-13 12:16
【摘要】：目前Rosenberg自尊量表的相关研究仍存在较多争议,如因素分析中自尊量表呈现的多维结构是自尊特质的多种维度还是其他因素造成的因子?正向自尊题目和反向自尊题目是否测量同一自尊特质?自尊量表的措辞效应性是否区别于特质因素?措辞效应具有跨量表的稳定性吗?为解决上述问题,本研究选用Rosenberg自尊量表(RSES)、双元孝道量表(DFPS)和自我监控力(SMS)等量表,对量表所有题目进行语义反转,形成陈述方向相反但表达意思相同的反转量表。从中国东部某高校随机选取1300名大学生作为研究对象进行施测,剔除回答不完整的问卷后,得有效被试1198人,占总被试人数的92.1%,其中男生696人(58%),女生502人(42%),平均年龄为18.7(SD=1.05),为了分析正反向题目对自尊量表带来的影响,我们对自尊量表的各个版本进行信度和验证性因素分析(CFA),比较正反向陈述题目的措辞效应对量表带来的信度和效度上的影响,最后采用多种量表同时进行CFA的方法来检测不同测量工具中的措辞效应的关系。研究结果表明:(1)正反向题目具有相同的测量学性能,正反向措辞效应能够严重影响量表的结构效度。(2)在中国被试中,自尊量表的正反向题目都存在措辞效应,而且措辞效应所解释的变异比重小于特质因子变异。(3)措辞效应并没有破坏自尊量表的单维结构,正向自尊题目和反向自尊题目测量的是同一自尊构念;同样,措辞效应也没有破坏孝道量表的结构,而孝量表本身是单维的因素结构。(4)在自尊、孝道、一般健康量表中的措辞效应高度一致,措辞效应具有跨量表的稳定性,我们将措辞效应视为一种稳定的反应风格或人格特质。
[Abstract]:At present, there are still many disputes about the related research of Rosenberg self-esteem scale. For example, the multidimensional structure of self-esteem scale in factor analysis is a multi-dimension of self-esteem traits or a factor caused by other factors. Does the forward self-esteem problem and the reverse self-esteem problem measure the same self-esteem traits? Is the worded effect of the self-esteem scale different from the trait factors? Does the wording effect have the stability of cross-scale? In order to solve the above problems, the Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSES), dual filial piety scale (DFPS) and self-monitoring (SMS) were used to reverse all the problems of the scale and form a reverse scale with the opposite direction of statement but the same meaning. 1300 college students were randomly selected from a university in eastern China as the subjects of the study. After excluding the incomplete questionnaire, 1198 valid subjects, accounting for 92.1% of the total number of subjects, were selected, including 696 boys (58%) and 502 girls (42%), with an average age of 18.7 (SD=1.05). In order to analyze the impact of positive and negative questions on the self-esteem scale, We analyze the reliability and validity of each version of the self-esteem scale by (CFA), to compare the influence of the wording effect of the positive and negative statement questions on the reliability and validity of the scale. Finally, we use the method of multiple scales to detect the relationship between the wording effects in different measurement tools by using the method of CFA at the same time. The results show that: (1) the positive and negative questions have the same measuring performance, and the positive and negative wording effects can seriously affect the structural validity of the scale. (2) in the Chinese subjects, the positive and negative questions of the self-esteem scale have the wording effect, and the proportion of variation explained by the wording effect is smaller than that of the trait factor variation. (3) the wording effect does not destroy the one-dimensional structure of the self-esteem scale. The positive self-esteem problem and the reverse self-esteem problem measure the same self-esteem construction. Similarly, the wording effect does not destroy the structure of the filial piety scale, and the filial piety scale itself is a single-dimensional factor structure. (4) in self-esteem, filial piety and general health scale, the wording effect is highly consistent, and the wording effect has the stability of the cross-scale. We regard the wording effect as a stable reaction style or personality trait.
【学位授予单位】：山东师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B841.7
本文编号：2498523
[Abstract]:At present, there are still many disputes about the related research of Rosenberg self-esteem scale. For example, the multidimensional structure of self-esteem scale in factor analysis is a multi-dimension of self-esteem traits or a factor caused by other factors. Does the forward self-esteem problem and the reverse self-esteem problem measure the same self-esteem traits? Is the worded effect of the self-esteem scale different from the trait factors? Does the wording effect have the stability of cross-scale? In order to solve the above problems, the Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSES), dual filial piety scale (DFPS) and self-monitoring (SMS) were used to reverse all the problems of the scale and form a reverse scale with the opposite direction of statement but the same meaning. 1300 college students were randomly selected from a university in eastern China as the subjects of the study. After excluding the incomplete questionnaire, 1198 valid subjects, accounting for 92.1% of the total number of subjects, were selected, including 696 boys (58%) and 502 girls (42%), with an average age of 18.7 (SD=1.05). In order to analyze the impact of positive and negative questions on the self-esteem scale, We analyze the reliability and validity of each version of the self-esteem scale by (CFA), to compare the influence of the wording effect of the positive and negative statement questions on the reliability and validity of the scale. Finally, we use the method of multiple scales to detect the relationship between the wording effects in different measurement tools by using the method of CFA at the same time. The results show that: (1) the positive and negative questions have the same measuring performance, and the positive and negative wording effects can seriously affect the structural validity of the scale. (2) in the Chinese subjects, the positive and negative questions of the self-esteem scale have the wording effect, and the proportion of variation explained by the wording effect is smaller than that of the trait factor variation. (3) the wording effect does not destroy the one-dimensional structure of the self-esteem scale. The positive self-esteem problem and the reverse self-esteem problem measure the same self-esteem construction. Similarly, the wording effect does not destroy the structure of the filial piety scale, and the filial piety scale itself is a single-dimensional factor structure. (4) in self-esteem, filial piety and general health scale, the wording effect is highly consistent, and the wording effect has the stability of the cross-scale. We regard the wording effect as a stable reaction style or personality trait.
【学位授予单位】：山东师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B841.7
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 杨廷忠,黄丽,吴贞一;中文健康问卷在中国大陆人群心理障碍筛选的适宜性研究[J];中华流行病学杂志;2003年09期
，本文编号：2498523
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/2498523.html
