汉武帝应对侍从群体研究

发布时间:2018-01-08 07:33

  本文关键词:汉武帝应对侍从群体研究 出处:《华中师范大学》2007年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


  更多相关文章: 汉武帝 应对侍从 群体


【摘要】: 汉武帝时代群英荟萃、人才济济,各类人物在各自领域独领风骚。其中有这样一群人:他们出身贫寒,却成为天子宾客;职位低微,却难倒公卿;深受宠爱,却死于非命。这个群体非常特殊,汉武帝之前没有,之后也很少见,这就是本文要研究的:汉武帝的应对侍从群体。关于这个群体的研究,目前学术界关注的还非常少,或者说并没有认识到他们是以一个群体存在,更没有将他们作为一个特殊的侍从群体进行研究。 本文分为五个部分。绪论部分着重阐明选题的意义。是否存在一个应对侍从群体,这个群体和皇帝身边其他侍从有什么区别,对于这个群体中的人物如何界定,论文所依据的材料等,都在这一节解决。在确定了应对侍从群体的定义后,第一章,探讨应对侍从群体和古代门客文化之间的关系。应对侍从的学术渊源是辞赋家和纵横家,而辞赋家又是由纵横家递变而来,归根究底,应对侍从和纵横家关系最为密切。纵横家大都属于门客中的卿客一类,他们是由原始门客向专制国家的官僚转变的一个中间类型。应对侍从即是承接着这种转变,并在汉武帝的特殊用人政策的推动下而产生的一个特殊群体。第二章论述应对侍从在朝政之中的作用。由于他们所担任角色的特殊性,,使他们在朝政中行使的职责和外廷大臣有很大的不同。这种不同表现在:他们并不承担日常行政公务,而是侍侯在武帝身边充当政治顾问或依据武帝需要帮助处理一些棘手问题。比如,他们常常会由皇帝指派,与外廷大臣论难,或作为特使出使地方。在分析了应对侍从的政治作用后,第三章分析他们这个角色的特殊之处,即临时性、工具性和文学性。前两种特性是他们作为皇帝谋臣而具备的,后一个则是他们作为皇帝侍从而具备的。除了作为一个政治符号而存在,他们也是有血有肉的人,第四章着重从历史的眼光品评这些人物的优劣得失。本文旨在通过对应对侍从群体的研究,加深对汉武帝时代的政治状况的理解,希望对汉武帝时代的人物研究作一点补充。
[Abstract]:In the period of Emperor Wu Emperor of the Han Dynasty, people gathered together and were talented, and all kinds of figures were leading the way in their respective fields. Among them, there were a group of people: they came from poor backgrounds, but they became guests of the son of Heaven; The position is low, but the public secretary is difficult; This group is very special, did not have before, after also very rare, this is what this article wants to study: Han Wu emperor's response servant group. About this group research. At present, the academic community pays little attention to them, or does not realize that they exist as a group, let alone regard them as a special group of waiters to study. This article is divided into five parts. The introduction focuses on the significance of the topic. Whether there is a response to the group of attendants, this group and other attendants around the emperor what is the difference. How to define the characters in this group, the material on which the paper is based, are all solved in this section. After the definition of the response group, the first chapter. This paper discusses the relationship between the response attendants group and the ancient Menke culture. The academic origin of the response attendants is the ci Fu family and the vertical and horizontal family, and the ci Fu family comes from the vertical and horizontal family, which is in the final analysis. The most close relationship is between the servants and the vertical and horizontal family. Most of them belong to the category of "Qing guest" among the door guests. They are an intermediate type of bureaucratic transition from primitive gatekeepers to autocratic states. And under the promotion of the special employment policy of Emperor Wu Emperor of the Han Dynasty, a special group was produced. The second chapter discusses the role of response attendants in the government, because of the particularity of their role. The duties they perform in government are quite different from those of foreign ministers. The difference is that they do not assume daily administrative duties. Rather, they served as political advisers to the emperor or helped to deal with thorny issues according to the emperor's needs. For example, they were often appointed by the emperor and discussed with foreign ministers. After analyzing the political role of responding attendants, the third chapter analyzes the special part of their role, that is, temporary. Instrumentality and literariness. The first two characteristics are possessed by them as emperors' courtiers, the latter as servants of emperors. In addition to being a political symbol, they are also flesh and blood. Chapter 4th focuses on evaluating the merits and demerits of these characters from the perspective of history. This paper aims to deepen the understanding of the political situation of the times of Emperor Wu through the study of the response to the followers. I hope to add a little to the study of the characters in the period of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty.
【学位授予单位】:华中师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2007
【分类号】:K234.1

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 王彦辉;汉武帝用人政策浅析[J];东北师大学报;1988年03期

2 陈深汉;汉武帝人才政策述论[J];河池师专学报(社会科学版);2001年03期

3 周积明;纵横家与纵横家智谋──《七子话权谋》序[J];湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1994年01期

4 孙键;;西汉侍中述论[J];哈尔滨学院学报;2006年03期

5 齐书深,靳维柏;论汉武帝的用人方略[J];吉林大学社会科学学报;1995年04期

6 李瑞兰;汉初人才问题与汉武帝隆儒抑老之策[J];历史教学;1994年07期

7 乔国华;汉武帝时期中朝形成过程简析[J];历史教学;2002年02期

8 吴刚;论汉武帝的人才观[J];史林;1997年01期

9 袁礼华;汉举贤良与贤良对策述论[J];南昌大学学报(社会科学版);1996年02期

10 孙景坛;汉武帝采纳主父偃的“推恩令”是中国传统文化反思的科学基点──二论“汉武帝罢黜百家独尊儒术子虚乌有”[J];南京社会科学;1995年04期



本文编号:1396204

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zggdslw/1396204.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户2e895***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com