官方参与下清代藏族部落纠纷解决机制——基于光绪朝甘青藏区卡家与沙沟争佃纠纷案例的分析

发布时间：2018-03-01 01:15

本文关键词： 晚清藏族部落争佃纠纷解决机制　出处：《西北师大学报(社会科学版)》2015年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：晚清时期卡家与沙沟争佃纠纷是官方参与下解决部落纠纷的典型案例。从这个案例中可以考察官方参与下清代藏族部落纠纷解决机制:纠纷中发生械斗、互殴而伤命时,官方最先以"谕饬"的方式制止;群体纠纷无法制止时,官方又采用"以兵弹压"的方式协助解决纠纷;对于一些涉及到多个行政区域的纠纷案件,官方联合会审、调查,且主要以调解方式解决;官方在裁判藏族内部纠纷时会援引以前的判定标准,且会借助民间权威协助具结案件;藏族内部纠纷解决后,官方有催缴纠纷各方的赔偿款和应对其案件复发的义务。此类纠纷解决机制表现出两个特点:第一,维持势力均衡是官方解决藏族内部纠纷的基本导向;第二,藏族部落间的纠纷往往隐藏着寺院集团的利益冲突。
[Abstract]:The dispute between Ka Jia and Shagou in the late Qing Dynasty is a typical case of resolving tribal disputes with the participation of the government. The official first tried to stop the dispute by "warning"; when the group dispute could not be stopped, the government again used the method of "using military force to suppress" to help resolve the dispute; for some disputes involving many administrative regions, the official federation tried and investigated the case. And it is mainly resolved by mediation; the authorities will invoke the previous judgment criteria when adjudicating internal disputes among Tibetans, and will assist in settling cases with the help of civil authority; after the settlement of internal disputes among Tibetans, The government has the obligation to call upon the parties to the dispute to pay compensation and to deal with the recurrence of their cases. This dispute resolution mechanism shows two characteristics: first, maintaining the balance of power is the basic guide for the official settlement of internal disputes among Tibetans; and second, Disputes between Tibetan tribes often hide conflicts of interest among monasteries.
【作者单位】：贵州师范大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“明清民国时期甘青川边藏区社会控制研究”(11XZS013)
【分类号】：K249

【参考文献】