明代士大夫的出处困惑及其抉择

发布时间：2018-03-04 00:04

本文选题：明代　切入点：士大夫　出处：《北京联合大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2013年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：出处去就,与取予、死生并列,为儒家学者必须面临的三大关口。出处进退,更是被儒家士大夫称为士君子的"大闲"。出处之辨,其中心内涵就是"为己"与"为人"之辨。因深处社会变动相对较为激烈的时代,最终导致明代士大夫的出处观念,出现了一些转向,甚至呈现出"多样化"的趋势。当面临出处的抉择时,明代士大夫出现了困惑,甚至出现两大偏向:一是不以高蹈为洁,通过济世立功,藉此表正当世;二是一旦碰到社会动荡的时代,即使具有孔孟用世之心,亦不得不退处山林。
[Abstract]:Where to go, and to take, to live side by side, is the Confucian scholars must face the three major gates. Go out and retreat, but also by Confucian scholars and officials as the "great leisure". Its central connotation is to distinguish between "for oneself" and "for man". Due to the relatively fierce social changes in the depths of the times, it eventually led to the Ming Dynasty literati and officials of the provenance concept, there has been some turn. Even showing a trend of "diversification". When faced with the choice of origin, the Ming Dynasty literati and officials appeared confused, and even appeared two major biases: first, not to dance high for clean, through the help of the world to do meritorious service, taking this as a legitimate world; Second, once the times of social unrest, even with the heart of Confucius and Mencius, but also had to retreat from the mountains.
【作者单位】：西南大学历史学院;
【分类号】：K248

【共引文献】