宋代思想家有关“封建”问题的思考

发布时间：2018-04-01 09:05

本文选题：封建　切入点：士大夫　出处：《暨南大学》2006年硕士论文

【摘要】：“封建”一词，最早见于《诗经》，至今依然为一活用词。然因其自身的丰富涵义与西文对译时的误读及后人的想当然等，使其成为一个歧义百出的词语。而正因为其尚未成为死文字，所以误读危害更甚。且“封建”一词贯通商周于今之间，，与各代意识形态和政权结构又有着密切关系，不深究其意义衍化的历史脉络，高而论之，一部国史便无从读起。故溯词源，回归“封建”的本义，析分各阶段意义之变迁。且立足于宋代，考究宋士大夫如何玩味“封建”，如何置“封建”于政论与时评之中，于此阐发宋代士大夫意识形态结构中之“封建”本义，及“封建制”在宋代复归后与三代“封建”原型之异同。并析以文献，试以计较“封建”作为一政治主张于宋政治实况是否契合，并借以探讨“封建”复归的命运。
[Abstract]:The term "feudalism", first found in the Book of songs, is still a living word. It is because it has not become a dead word, so misreading is even more harmful. Moreover, the word "feudalism", which runs through the Shang and Zhou dynasties, is closely related to the ideology and the structure of political power of all generations. If we do not go into the historical context of its meaning evolution, it is impossible to read a national history. Therefore, we can go back to the etymology, return to the original meaning of "feudalism", analyze the changes of meaning in different stages, and base ourselves on the Song Dynasty. How did the literati and officials of the Song Dynasty play with "feudalism", how to put "feudalism" in the political theory and in the commentary of the times, and then explain the original meaning of "feudalism" in the ideological structure of the literati and bureaucrats in the Song Dynasty? And the similarities and differences between the "feudal system" and the "feudal" archetypes of the three generations after the return of the Song Dynasty. In the light of the literature, this paper tries to discuss whether the "feudalism" as a political proposition fits in with the political reality of the Song Dynasty and probes into the fate of the "feudal" return.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2006
【分类号】：K244

【相似文献】