儒家经典的人类学研究与反思——以《周礼》研究为中心

发布时间:2018-04-13 16:55

  本文选题:人类学本土化 + 儒家经典 ; 参考:《青海民族研究》2014年04期


【摘要】:人类学根植于古希腊经典,而人类学中国本土化实践也与经典研究的人类学转向密切相关。百年研究实践表明,关注并深入经典是人类学本土化实践的重要方向之一。在当今反思、重建文化传统与解决民族融合、生态危机特别是人际生态等重大国策问题面前,中国经典尤其是儒家经典作为最重要的思想资源,无疑是人类学本土化实践必须关注的"文本田野"。儒家经典人类学研究的核心方法四重证据法及其间性互补调和了证据真实与理解真实间的紧张关系,是人文社科研究中相对科学又具操作性的研究方法。然而实际操作中诸如物象叙事在何种程度上足以替代文字叙事,人类学和考古学对无文字社会的文化重构经验,在何种程度上适用于有文字社会,物证与书证矛盾时该如何权衡辨识等问题值得所有用人类学方法来研究经典者深思。
[Abstract]:Anthropology is rooted in ancient Greek classics, and the practice of Chinese localization of anthropology is closely related to the anthropological turn of classical research.A hundred years of research practice shows that it is one of the important directions of anthropological localization practice to pay attention to and go deep into classics.In the face of the major national policy issues, such as rethinking, rebuilding cultural traditions and solving ethnic integration, ecological crisis, especially interpersonal ecology, Chinese classics, especially Confucian classics, are regarded as the most important ideological resources.Undoubtedly, it is a text field that must be paid attention to in the practice of anthropology localization.The core method of classical anthropology of Confucianism, the four-fold evidence method and its complementary nature, reconcile the tension between evidential truth and understanding of reality, and are relatively scientific and operable research methods in the study of humanities and social sciences.However, in practice, such as the extent to which the narrative of objects is sufficient to replace the narrative of writing, the experience of anthropology and archaeology in reconstructing the culture of a non-literate society, and to what extent it applies to a society with characters,How to balance identification in the contradiction between material evidence and documentary evidence is worth studying by anthropological method.
【作者单位】: 上海交通大学;
【基金】:%E7%A4%BC%E5%99%A8%E7%A5%9E%E8%AF%9D%E4%B8%8E%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E7%A4%BC%E5%88%B6%E8%AF%9D%E8%AF%AD%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%E3%80%8B(13CZW022),%E3%80%8A%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E6%96%87%E5%AD%A6%E4%BA%BA%E7%B1%BB%E5%AD%A6%E7%90%86%E8%AE%BA%E4%B8%8E%E6%96%B9%E6%B3%95%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%E3%80%8B(10&ZD100)%E9%98%B6%E6%AE%B5%E6%80%A7%E6%88%90%E6%9E%9C" target="_blank">国家社科基金项目《<周礼>礼器神话与中国礼制话语研究》(13CZW022),《中国文学人类学理论与方法研究》(10&ZD100)阶段性成果
【分类号】:K224.06

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前4条

1 崔俊植;;东北亚文明的创造性起源与发展性保存——以中国和韩国的宗教思想和礼仪为中心(下)[J];当代韩国;2012年03期

2 叶舒宪;;物的叙事:中华文明探源的四重证据法[J];兰州大学学报(社会科学版);2010年06期

3 徐杰舜;叶舒宪;王铭铭;彭兆荣;徐新建;;人类学与国学[J];百色学院学报;2007年02期

4 唐启翠;;氃与y,

本文编号:1745382


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zggdslw/1745382.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户603ae***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com