清代山东对外贸易研究
[Abstract]:Previously, researches on foreign trade in Qing Dynasty focused on southeast coastal provinces, while foreign trade in Shandong was still outside academic field of vision. In fact, Shandong occupies an important position in the foreign trade system of Qing Dynasty and has distinct characteristics. The study of Shandong foreign trade in Qing Dynasty can not only serve as the basis of regional comparative study, but also help to clear up some outstanding problems in foreign trade in Qing Dynasty. Twelve years before Shunzhi (1655), whether or not the Qing Dynasty actually carried out the regulations of "Private exit and illegal entry into the Sea" in the Qing Dynasty was one of the hot points in the history circles for a long time. Shunzhi ten years (1653), the Qing government in the handling of Shandong Jimo female smuggling cases in Japan, its sentencing is based on the "private exit and illegal going into the sea" regulations. This shows that in Shunzhi 12 years ago, the Qing Dynasty began to control foreign trade. During the period of Shunzhi from 12 years to Kangxi 23 years (1684), Shandong's foreign trade policy showed obvious particularity compared with Fujian, Guangdong and other southeast coastal provinces. First, it was late to move to the sea. Fujian moved to the sea in Shunzhi eighteen years (1661), while Shandong was late to Kangxi two years (1663). Second, small efforts to move to the sea. Fujian and other places moved 30 to 50 miles to the sea, while Shandong only moved the residents of the islands inland. Third, open the sea early. Shandong Kaihai was at the beginning of Kangxi, five years earlier than southern Zhejiang, Fujian, Guangdong and other provinces. Therefore, banning and moving sea is not an established policy of Qing government, but a temporary measure to guard against Qing forces such as Zheng Chenggong. The true purpose of the Qing government in 56 (1717) was neither to prohibit rice from leaving the sea nor to restrict the gathering of overseas Chinese in the Nanyang, but to prevent riots during Emperor Kangxi's old age. At that time, two major events in Shandong had an impact on this decision, one was the collusion between waste princelings and the sea invaders, the other was the etiquette dispute in Shandong. Yantai port before, Deng, Lai, Qingsanfu Haikou is the convergence of merchant ships. Since Xianfeng nine years (1859), the Qing government in Yantai, Longkou, Tiemen pass, Shidao, Jinjiakou and Jiaozhou Tabutou set up a bureau to collect sea taxes, Jinjiakouli Bureau set up a branch of Qingdao. Since then, Yantai, Qingdao just opened port. This shows that the western countries did not create a new port system for Shandong, but made use of the original port system to serve it. The opening of commercial ports in Jinan, Zhoucun and Weixian in 1905 restricted the trade expansion of western countries. Promoted the development of Shandong foreign trade. The prosperity of Shandong foreign trade in Qing Dynasty was manifested in three aspects. First of all, Shandong has formed two distinct north-south port system with reasonable geographical distribution. The second is the expansion of trade to Europe, the Americas and Africa. Again, the scale of trade is growing rapidly. The development of Shandong traditional handicraft industry and commodity agriculture in Qing Dynasty laid a solid material foundation for the prosperity of foreign trade, and the coastal trade opened up a new channel for the development of foreign trade. During the period from Kangxi Kaihai to Yantai, Shandong's entrepot trade through Shanghai, Suzhou and Ningbo was especially developed. Hong Kong, Shanghai and Chaozhou became the three major transit ports for Shandong's foreign trade after the opening of Yantai and Qingdao. After 1895, the volume of trade between Shandong and Japan and North Korea soared, making Shandong gradually.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2006
【分类号】:K249
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张士尊;;清代盛京大凌河马厂兴废研究[J];东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年04期
2 何锡彭;;关于清代的美术教育研究[J];大众文艺;2011年11期
3 张颖华;;清代自然灾害危机应对策略研究[J];求索;2011年06期
4 刘文鹏;;清代科道“风闻奏事”权力的弱化及其政治影响[J];中州学刊;2011年04期
5 张世友;;清代乌江流域的移民活动及其对民族关系的影响[J];重庆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年03期
6 高晓波;;清代安多民族聚居区的政区设置变化及其原因[J];西藏民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年03期
7 任玉雪;;论清代东北地区的厅[J];中国历史地理论丛;2011年03期
8 陈二峰;;清代湖北汉水流域的民间信仰[J];江汉论坛;2011年09期
9 罗道福;;刍议清代赣南的早期工业化[J];江西教育学院学报;2011年03期
10 张光宇;;清代山东移民黑龙江述论[J];佳木斯大学社会科学学报;2011年03期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 杨恒恒;;金融危机对山东外贸的影响及外贸企业应对策略分析[A];建设经济文化强省:挑战·机遇·对策——山东省社会科学界2009年学术年会文集(2)[C];2009年
2 张燕洁;万芳;;清代中西医汇通丛书研究初探[A];全国第十一届中医医史文献学术研讨会论文集[C];2008年
3 卢银兰;;清代广东番禺人陈璞与中医[A];中华中医药学会全国第十七届医古文学术研讨会论文集[C];2008年
4 蔡克荣;;清代书院的经费运作[A];纪念《教育史研究》创刊二十周年论文集(3)——中国教育制度史研究[C];2009年
5 王一帆;孔云峰;姚俊刚;;河南省清代1809-1819、1836-1881年两时段县级赋税GIS[A];第四届海峡两岸GIS发展研讨会暨中国GIS协会第十届年会论文集[C];2006年
6 徐晓光;;改土归流中的一场典型诉讼事件——从清末四川茂州羌民控告土司案件看民族地区的诉讼与司法[A];民族法学评论(第6卷·2008年)[C];2008年
7 萧凌波;;清代东蒙地区对华北平原水旱灾害异地响应方式变迁及其影响因素探讨[A];中国地理学会百年庆典学术论文摘要集[C];2009年
8 丁海斌;陈凡;;论清代科举与“官科技”[A];全球化视阈中的科技与社会——全国科技与社会(STS)学术年会(2007)论文集[C];2007年
9 丁海斌;陈凡;;论清代科举与“官科技”[A];“青年科学家创新与社会条件支持系统”课题研究论文集[C];2006年
10 张民服;;试论清代中原经贸业的发展[A];黄河文明与可持续发展(第1卷第1期)[C];2008年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 记者温闽;山东外贸出口超过二百亿美元[N];人民日报海外版;2002年
2 陈爱国;山东外贸增势迅猛[N];国际商报;2002年
3 洪一树;清代“大观园”宏琳厝[N];中国旅游报;2000年
4 青岛特办;山东外贸出口突破200亿美元[N];国际商报;2002年
5 张玉;山东外贸十月再攀新高[N];中国信息报;2002年
6 本报记者 张文敬 通讯员 信蓉;“山东外贸航母”是如何打造的[N];联合日报;2011年
7 国恩松 唐光;山东外贸企业进口检测设备[N];国际经贸消息;2002年
8 杨博;检验检疫部门对山东外贸工作的有力支持[N];中国国门时报;2002年
9 陕西 罗世广;偶得清代宫钱[N];中国商报;2002年
10 郭金涛 张庆伟;国际化战略推动山东外贸快速增长[N];国际商报;2000年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 赵树廷;清代山东对外贸易研究[D];山东大学;2006年
2 曲金燕;清代文言小说研究[D];苏州大学;2008年
3 周t ;清代广东盐业与地方社会[D];华中师范大学;2005年
4 刘晓U
本文编号:2207225
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zggdslw/2207225.html